Category: TV (Page 308 of 595)

Picard to engage…the TARDIS?

Earlier this week, U.K. tabloid The Sun reported a delicious “Doctor Who” rumor that will hopefully turn out to be more than scuttlebutt: Patrick Stewart taking on a guest-starring role in the series alongside his “Hamlet” co-star David Tennant. The scoop claims he will be playing the Meddling Monk, a fellow Time Lord who appeared only once in the classic series. The Sun is often correct with their “Who” rumors, but once again their report contains some dubious statements, such as the claim about the next series (season) screening next year, when it’s a well-known fact that Season Five won’t be unveiled until 2010, under the guidance of Steven Moffat. There will be four specials unveiled throughout 2009, but nothing’s been said publicly about any of them comprising a two-parter or that the Daleks will return. In any case, many a sci-fi nut will no doubt have their fingers crossed in hopes of this turning out to be true, as it would somewhat fulfill a major geek fantasy of seeing the two greatest TV sci-fi franchises crossing over (in a sense).

In the meantime, why not take a gander at ”The Time Meddler,” which was recently released on DVD? It features the one and only appearance of the Meddling Monk (played by Peter Butterworth), who isn’t quite as evil as the Master – he’s more of an intergalactic shit disturber. The story takes place in 1066, and sees the Doctor (William Hartnell) meeting another Time Lord for the first time in the series (although their race isn’t explicitly named – that didn’t happen until Patrick Troughton’s final story). The Monk is involved in an elaborate scheme which will ultimately change the outcome of the Battle of Hastings. Make no mistake, this is “Who” from 1965, which is a far cry from rapid fire adventures of Tennant, but this still makes for a weird little slice of TV history. (And if you’re really the sort of person who needs a star rating to consider something, then let’s call this one a three-star affair, shall we?)

Terry Pratchett’s Discworld Collection

After giving “Terry Pratchett’s Hogfather” a positive review earlier this year, I was eager to check out the latest release of video fodder from his Discworld universe. “Terry Pratchett’s Discworld Collection” encompasses two different tales from his oddball universe of magic and mysticism, only this time in animated form. “Wyrd Sisters” is the story of the orphan boy of a murdered king, and how the child comes to be in the care of a trio of witches (two of which are voiced by Jane Horrocks and June Whitfield of “Absolutely Fabulous”), all while the king’s ghost wanders around his castle, irate and perplexed by his offing. “Soul Music” tells the story of Buddy, who puts together a band to play a new type of sound – “music with rocks in.” (Get it – rock music?) As is often the case with Discworld, Death plays a pivotal role in both tales, voiced here by Christopher Lee. No doubt hardcore fans of Pratchett will be amused and delighted by these very faithful adaptations (the running times are 140 and 175 minutes respectively), but they may be the only ones. The animation is unfortunately something of a challenge to get through. Think of drawings a few steps below some of Ralph Bakshi’s older work and you can sort of guess what the style looks like – pretty but not fluid; colorful but lacking grace. However what these stories may lack in the visual department, they more than make up for in the realms of wit and imagination.

Click to buy “Terry Pratchett’s Discworld Collection “

Greetings to the New Show: “Life on Mars”

It’s time to lead off with another one in my seemingly endless series of shameful admissions, but for such an avowed Anglophile as myself, this one really hurts: I’ve never seen a single episode of the original British version of ABC’s new series, “Life on Mars.” And, frankly, I’m really, really embarrassed about it, because, boy howdy, is it a show that’s right up my alley.

Here’s the premise of the British version: Sam Tyler, Detective Chief Inspector with the Greater Manchester Police, is hit by a car in 2006…and when he wakes up, he’s in 1973. Not only that, but he’s a Detective Inspector with the Manchester and Salford Police Criminal Investigation Department. That’s right: he’s still Sam Tyler…and people in 1973 know him as such. So the question at hand is whether or not he’s traveled in time or if this is all just an elaborate fantasy concocted by his mind while he’s in a coma.

Totally awesome concept, no? I don’t know how I missed out on it, especially since it also takes its title from a David Bowie song, but on the up side, it means that I can appreciate the American version a lot more, since I won’t be constantly comparing it to the British version or complaining that it’s a word-for-word Xerox, problems which kept me from latching onto “The Office” right away.

Continue reading »

The Biggest Loser: Pulling The Same Crap

Well, we knew it was coming. NBC’s “The Biggest Loser: Couples” is soon going to be an individual competition again. It’s already halfway there. Like I’ve said, I don’t mind that, but don’t call it something it isn’t, and most of all, don’t confuse us so that we wind up not caring about the show.
Seriously.

Anyway, last night was the one-hour conclusion to the show that began before the presidential debates on Tuesday. So basically it was the last-chance workout for the week, a product placement bit with Subway, the weigh in and the elimination.

Coleen went first and lost three pounds, or 1.54%. That meant if she was below the yellow line, sshe was automatically eliminated since she was the only member left from her team (her dad was sent home last week). Then as each team weighed in and was losing 9, 9, 8, 8 and 12 pounds, I started to feel worried for Coleen. However, the orange team of Ed and Heba only lost 1.4%–Heba dropped 8 pounds but Ed did not lose any weight. Yikes.

So Ed and Heba, who by the way are newlyweds, had to decide who would stay at the ranch and who would go home alone. Heba is tall, but weighs almost 300 pounds….so Ed wanted her to stay to get in the best shape so that they could give themselves the best chance to have children. It was touching and sad, but the right decision.

They showed Ed at home, and he has lost 85 pounds to date, down from 335 to 250. Wow! Sometimes what’s lost in all the gameplay and rules changes is the fact that this show really helps people transform themselves and lose a ton of weight. And that’s why we watch, to root for them all. Tito, get me a tissue please……

New Rule: Pedophilia is not funny.

Sorry to bring everyone down, but I think it’s a point worth making. In a recent episode of “My Name Is Earl” (entitled “Joy in a Bubble”) the writers made a joke about pedophilia. Earl was talking to his brother, Randy, and he told him about Joy’s kids who didn’t have any friends because none of the other parents could stand Joy. Randy said (and I’m paraphrasing) that the guy downstairs has lots of friends who were young boys and maybe it would be a good idea to introduce the kids to him.

It’s not often, but every once in a while one sitcom or another will make a joke about pedophilia, usually within the context of the Catholic church’s recent scandals. I have as dark of a sense of humor as anyone, and in general I think the American viewing public is waaaaay too uptight, but since when is child rape funny? How many jokes do we hear about adult rape? I can’t think of a single one. Isn’t pedophilia just as bad or worse?

I don’t get it.

I’m not going to call out any specific writers (oddly enough the two credited for this episode are both female) because there’s no telling how that particular line ended up in the episode, but please stop making jokes about adults who rape kids.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑