Category: Movies (Page 456 of 498)

Speaking of superheroes…

the new “Spider-Man 3” teaser trailer is up.

Finally, we get to see Thomas Haden Church as the Sandman, Topher Grace as Eddie Brock, and what would appear to be a revisitation of that god-awful Green Goblin armor…though I presume it’s supposed to be James Franco (Harry Osbourne) in it this time around. (And given how Hollywood loves to rewrite comic book canon, they’re probably calling him the Hobgoblin, even though I’m pretty sure Harry was never the Hobgoblin.)

Looks awesome. Shame we have to wait ’til May of next year to see the damned movie, though.

Robin Williams as the Joker…?

I know, you’re gagging at the mere thought of it, because you’re picturing the worst-case scenario of Williams mugging it up even worse than Nicholson did when he had the role. That was my reaction, too…but then I read this interview, and, to my surprise, I find I’m now not quite as panicked as I once was. It turns out that Williams is actually a diehard fan of comic books and graphic novels…and he’s actually read the more recent interpretations of the Joker. Based on some of these statements, I have a suspicion that his take on the character would probably find him going from the over-the-top shenanigans that you would expect…and, then, just as you’re thinking, “Oh, Christ, this is my worst nightmare,” out of nowhere, he’d slit someone’s throat, the grin would disappear, and as the blood spurts everwhere, he’s sneering, “How’s that for a punchline?”

Read this, then click on the above link for the whole interview:

We asked Williams whether he saw The Joker as more over-the-top or dark.

“You can go both,” Williams said. “As in madness, there’s a lot of ways to go. I think you can really explore how bright and how nasty-funny he is, just like I guess what Kevin [Spacey] did with Lex Luthor, made him really funny, but yet still damaged… As evil is, accessible and yet still horrific. Jump back and forth all the time. I’m kidding… Kidding!”

On the second kidding, Williams gave me a soft poke in the throat with two fingers. Amusing, but a bit surprising.

“See there it is,” says Williams. “I saw your eyes go f**k off!”

You must be pulling my udder…

In this week’s “Answer Man” column, Roger Ebert receives an E-mail from a reader who just heard about the upcoming animated film, “Barnyard,” and is concerned that America’s already-existing reputation on the world front as being full of a bunch of dimbulbs will only be made worse by the fact that “the brain trust behind this movie spent a fortune to animate ‘cows’ with very prominent udders — all of which are dubbed with MALE VOICES.”

Indeed, Ebert confirms this. “Good gravy! I looked at the trailer, and saw a cow, its udder clearly visible, speaking in a male voice. The cows in the movie include Otis (Kevin James), Eddie (S. Scott Bullock), Budd (John DiMaggio) and Ben (gravel-voiced Sam Elliott). There is one girl cow, Bessie, voiced by Wanda Sykes. I’d like to hit Bessie for the 411 on wassup up with those he-cows.”

You just know that there’s some producer surrounded by yes-men who said, “Nobody knows that only female cows have udders, am I right?”

You bet, C.B.!

Box Office Roundup: Finger finger, trigger trigger, click click. Click click click.

Based on Sunday’s estimates, courtesy of boxofficemojo.com:

1) Click: $40 million (first week)
That’ll be the sound you hear when this movie is played on broadcast TV.
2) Cars: $22.5 million ($155.9 million, third week)
As Fillmore says, respect the classics. Like “Finding Nemo” and “The Incredibles.”
3) Nacho Libre: $12.1 million ($52.7 million, third week)
Go listen to Jill Sobule’s song “Mexican Wrestler” instead. It’s better and takes only four minutes.
4) Waist Deep: $9.5 million (first week)
You can put his name on the marquee, but that doesn’t mean that Tyrese Gibson is an actor.
5) The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift: $9.2 million ($42.6 million, second week)
It figures that Vin Diesel would express interest in his old franchise right as it’s grinding to a halt.

Tommy Chong and the Evil Bong

evilbong

We just had to link to this piece from Cinematical about hacktastic auteur Charles Band’s next movie, “Evil Bong.”

Cinematical got the headline right, but Band has clearly missed an opportunity if he is honestly making a movie about an evil bong, starring Tommy Chong, but does not intend to call it “Tommy Chong and the Evil Bong.”

You’ve got Tommy Chong. You’ve got an evil bong. Why on earth would you call your movie anything other than “Tommy Chong and the Evil Bong.” Rolls right off the tongue, with a lovely rhyming cadence.

And based on that title alone, everyone who becomes aware of this movie is either in or out…just like that other perfectly-named blockbuster-in-the-making, “Snakes on a Plane.”

Now, granted, Band may be avoiding the inclusion of Chong’s name in the title because he wants to protect the egos of his other stars…or because Chong’s character in the movie has a name that doesn’t rhyme with bong…or because Band simply doesn’t enjoy a good Chong-bong rhyme like the rest of us.

But calling this thing “Evil Bong” waters down what could otherwise be a craptastic title for the ages.

Uhhhh….huh-huh. I said “bongwater.”

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑