Category: Fall TV Preview (Page 26 of 27)

TCA Press Tour: Can a Friday night timeslot save “Friday Night Lights”?

We’ll see. But I’m sure we’re all thinking approximately the same thing about this move: aren’t most of the people who’d want to watch a show about a high school football team the same people who, on Friday nights, are actually going out to see real high school football teams play? Surely that’s occurred to someone at NBC. Maybe they just figure that this is a show that people like enough to record and watch when they get home; the question is, will that result in enough viewership to save the series beyond this second year?

Half the problem, of course, is that everyone thinks “Friday Night Lights” is just about football. It’s not. Well, not entirely, anyway. Additionally, it’s the story of small-town America, and arguably one of the most realistic ever seen on television; maybe that’s why NBC decided to stick with it for a second season. At the very least, it’s certainly why they’ve been going out of their way to trumpet the “it’s not just about football” thing in their ads for Year 2.

“The network has been so supportive of the show from the beginning,” says Executive Producer Jason Katims. “And, you know, we’re sitting here today because they’ve been so supportive. And we’re not really trying to change the show. And what we mean to say — you know, we’re not saying it’s not a show about football. We think this is a show that is for everybody, that should reach a female audience as well. And I think it’s been — it’s been a challenge to — for women to know that they would like the show because of the football thing. And that’s the thing that we’re trying to sort of overcome. That’s really about marketing.”

For those who were watching last season, the producers have decided on a not-entirely-surprising tactic by fast-forwarding eight months…to the next football season. As a result, Connie Britton’s character – Tami Taylor, Coach Taylor’s wife – will be having her baby in the season premiere.

“It was really an exciting idea for us to start eight months later,” says Katims, “because we…we love the idea of all the stuff that’s gone on in those intervening eight months and picking up people in the middle of things. We’re starting out of the gate with Tami going to have this baby in the first episode. And suddenly she’s in Austin with this infant — I mean
she’s dealing with this infant and with a 16-year-old daughter who is acting out more than she ever has before. And Coach Taylor is coaching at TMU in Austin, and this idea of this long-distance relationship that seemed like a great idea at the time suddenly doesn’t seem like such a great idea. And they’re wondering whether they made the biggest mistake of their lives.”

Katims didn’t offer up specifics, but he did allow that the Coach wouldn’t be at TMU for the entire season. (Actually, his initial claim, which brought considerable laughter from the crowd, was that the entire TMU storyline “was a contractual request from Kyle, and it has to be at least five episodes.” Connie Britton kidded, “He’s such a diva.”)

TCA Press Tour: Fantastic “Journeyman”? Well, the potential’s there, anyway…

When it comes to movies and TV series that involve time travel, there’s really only one way to approach them: turn off your mind and enjoy them for the entertainment that they are (or, at least, should be). If you start trying to work out what’s a paradox and what’s not, you’ll get a headache and, more importantly, you won’t be able to enjoy the fun. Not that “Journeyman” is really about the fun; it is – what a shock – a bit dark, blending sci-fi, mystery, and romance, offering up just enough of an intriguing premise to get you curious, but maybe not enough to keep you tuning in for the long haul. Not unless they start offering up some answers pretty quickly, that is.

Oh, but you’re wondering about the concept.

So says the original press release: “”Dan Vasser thought he had it all: a loving wife, a great son and a steady job. But life suddenly throws him a curve ball. Dan finds himself traveling into the past with a purpose – impacting people’s lives for the better – and sometimes the worse. While doing so, Dan reconnects with Livia Beale, his ex-fiancée, whom he lost in a mysterious plane crash. Now armed with the knowledge of the present, will he be able to save her? What would that mean to his own future? And how would it change a man who thought he had it all?”

Great idea. And not at all like “The Time Travelers’ Wife.”

Okay, that’s unfair. And, besides, producer Kevin Falls swears on a stack of bibles that he’s never read the book.

“I am one of these guys who always kind of wishes he could do everything over,” he explains, “and it has a lot to do with the disasterous dating pattern. And I was at a dinner party the other night, and we all started talking about who had Googled old girlfriends or boyfriends, and, like, everybody at this party said they had. And it just started getting me on that road of people sometimes wondering if their life had taken a different course. And I thought, what could be the ultimate love story where he has to, like — where the character has to straddle two different families in a way that feels epic. And I thought being married to somebody he loves, and then he travels at a time where he has a fiancee that may have been his soul mate, and it’s like, “Now what am I going to do?”‘ And that’s kind of the genesis of it.

“But,” he adds, “I hope that people love the book enough to go, ‘Okay, this might totally be the kind of thing that I would be interested in.'”

At the very least, it certainly interested Kevin McKidd, who you may recognize from his role as Lucius on “Rome.” I don’t know why people love that show,” he says of his former gig…but he is willing to theorize.

“I think it’s that it’s not a generic, standard, straightforward TV show…in the same way that ‘Journeyman’ isn’t. You are not going to just go and get the same meal every Monday night or Sunday night when ‘Rome’ was on. It changed, and the stories would change. And there would be — one episode would be an event episode, and the next episode would have a different slant and a different balance and a different focus instead of it being generic and, you know, the three-act structure. TV doesn’t work that way. But I think, getting back to ‘Journeyman,’ since that’s what we are here for, I think that’s one of the things I love. I mean, in a way, when I looked at ‘Journeyman,’ I felt that seems like a logical next step for me because, having gone from a show like ‘Rome,’ which is so event-style TV that’s very of its own, it would feel like a step back to me to kind of go into a cop drama or something much more box standard, you know, I mean, not being disrespectful to any of those shows because they are all well-made and fantastic classmen. But, for me,
‘Journeyman’ just felt like, you know, very — very interesting and emotional and truthful, and yet it sparked the imagination for me as an actor.”

The pilot episode of “Journeyman” – which, as we all know, may or may not be what we actually end up seeing on the air come the fall – is a little confusing at times, but, as noted, the show crosses several different genres; plus, it’s scored the sweet post-“Heroes” timeslot, which will surely work in its favor. That’s right, NBC has finally realized that they need to provide a proper follow-up for “Heroes”…and given that the show’s lead-in is “Chuck,” we’ve actually got the first all-sci-fi (more or less) night of TV in years. I know, I’m a geek, but I don’t care: I’m psyched!

P.S. On the subject of paradoxes and the long-standing sci-fi rule on time travel where if you change one thing, you change everything, Falls says simply, “Yeah, I don’t think it’s been proven.”

TCA Press Tour: You’re up, “Chuck.”

I don’t know why NBC is so insistent about calling its new show, “Chuck,” a drama. It’s not a drama. It might have hints of drama; ultimately, though, it’s an action-comedy…with considerable emphasis on the comedy, thanks to the tag-team efforts of Zachary Levi and Joshua Gomez. You might know Levi from his work on the ABC comedy, “Less than Perfect”…but, then again, as Levi himself admits, you may not. (When referencing the show during the panel, he began by saying, “For anybody who watched ‘Less Than Perfect’…so, what, probably 5 or 10 of you…?”) Gomez, however, comes off stints on “Invasion” and “Without A Trace,” but even without a solid comedic background, he nonetheless comes across a lot like Seth Green on coke. (That’s a good thing…or, at least, I think it is, anyway.)

In the long run, though, most people will be interested in “Chuck” because it’s the handiwork of Josh Schwartz, late of “The O.C..” Certainly, that was the case with several of the reporters in attendance, one of whom brought up the fact that Chuck works in a Best-Buy-like store, then asked, “Is the store big enough that it will one day have a stage on which indie bands can perform?”

“Absolutely,” said Schwartz, with a grin. “In-store promotion, we’ll get it done.”

Going on, however, Schwartz made it clear what appealed to him about “Chuck.” “After ‘The O.C.,’ I was definitely looking to do something that would have more of a genre element to it, but still be able to do it in the style in which I like to write and the kind of characters that I very much enjoy. And Chris (Fedak, co-producer) and I, we went to film school together. We sat down, and he had the initial concept for the show, which I thought was really interesting and could also
be really funny and would give us really the spine we needed to tell this story and to do it in a way that could speak to the ‘quarter-life’ crisis that our character of Chuck is undergoing and also be able to do it with a lot of humor as well.”

Speaking of humor, it’s clear that Levi learned quite a few comedic chops while on “Less Than Perfect,” whether anyone was watching it or not. When asked if he considered himself to be smart (if not necessarily as smart as his character), Levi responded, “He went to Stanford and is this crazy brain of a guy and can figure out algorithms. I can’t even spell
‘algorithm.’ I always have the excuse that I would’ve gone to college if I had applied myself. So, no, I’m not as smart as Chuck…but I like to think I’m decent, right? Maybe? I hope!”

Executive producer McG (he was behind the “Charlie’s Angels” movies, you know) went on to acknowledge that “Chuck” owes a certain debt to the work of William Gibson…if not necessarily the film version of “Johnny Mnemonic.” “It’s called a seminal performance of Keanu Reeves,” McG said, with a laugh, before explaining that he’s had a long association with that film’s AD staff, who used to tell horror stories about the difficulty of the shoot.

As the panel wrapped up, Schwartz was asked if there was anything he might’ve learned from his experiences on “The O.C.” that he would make a point of not repeating on “Chuck.”

“What are you implying?” he snapped. Then, after offering a smile, he admitted that he’d learned quite a lot during his time on the show. “‘The “O.C.’ was my first experience doing anything that was, you know, out there. It was a great experience, but it was also a tremendous learning experience. So there’s a lot of things that I will take from that and apply here.

“I think most of all, it’s staying focused on the work itself and not trying to worry about all the other things. We have a great group of people that we’re doing the show with. I’m really fortunate to work with Chris and McG and we’re having a blast making this show, and that’s the thing I just real wanted to be able to stay focused on.”

TCA Press Tour: I am so totally pro-“Bionic Woman”

I know, you’re skeptical. You’re thinking, “It’s the freaking Bionic Woman! How good can it be?” It can be very good, my friend. It’s a dark re-invention of the franchise, and – like “Battlestar: Galactica,” it’s a re-invention so dramatic that, if my hazy memory of the original series serves me well, the only thing that’s made the transition from old series to new is the name of the lead character: Jamie Sommers, played by British actress Michelle Ryan. (Ryan also appears in BBC America’s new series, “Jekyll,” as it happens.)

Of course, this begs the question, “Why bother to re-make the series at all? Why not just create a brand new series that’s about a woman who gets bionic parts?” Accusations of the producers just trying to cash in on the vague recollections of children of the ’70s have been flying, but they swear that’s not the case. Then again, though, they don’t really do much to dispel the concept, either.

I’m sure the panel saw it coming that the reporters would eventually start throwing questions at them about Isaiah Washington’s upcoming stint on the show; if so, they weren’t disappointed. First, however, they had to get past the concerns that there was some ominous reason for Katee Sackhoff’s absence from the panel, possibly connected to the fact that doesn’t actually have a deal set yet. Smilovic calmed them down pretty quickly on that front, though, by stating matter-of-factly that “Katee is on the show. I’m not going to go into the specific natures of the deals. She’s on the show, and she’s not here today because of a scheduling conflict; that’s the only reason she’s not here today.”

The second half of the conference, however, was almost entirely dedicated to queries about Washington’s appearance and how much re-writing of the role – which existed before it was ever pitched to him – was required to fit him into it (the only change is that the character was originally sketched out to be around for an indefinite period of time; now, he has a definitive exit) and if casting Washington is an insult to the gay community. (Said producer Jason Smilovic, “Absolutely not. We embrace the gay community, we are hoping that they are going to watch the show, and we are in no way making any judgments or statements or assignations about what was said or what was done.”)

Is Isaiah Washington really worth all this discussion? I think the situation is abundantly clear: the guy’s great in front of the camera, but, when he’s off-camera, he’s got a nasty case of foot-in-mouth disease. So just get him to shut the hell up and stick to acting.

Anyway, Washington or no Washington, “Bionic Woman” looks awesome to me. It’s dark, it’s action-packed, and it has Miguel Ferrer in it. (Albert Rosenfeld rules!)

My only concern is that it was revealed that Jamie’s sister is being completely retooled from what we saw in the pilot; once, she was deaf, but now she’s not. She’s also now got a background in computer hacking. On the whole, I think the deaf angle was far more interesting. Plus, count on a lot of really annoyed deaf people wanting to know why the character was changed…

TCA Press Tour: Law & Order & stuff

If you haven’t heard already, when NBC’s fall season begins, there will only be two “Law & Order” series still on the network: the original and “L&O: Special Victims Unit.” But don’t cry for “L&O: Criminal Intent” just yet: the show will continue with new episodes on the USA Network, which is also part of the NBC-Universal family.

“L&O” creator Dick Wolf showed up with a statement in hand to clarify how the network would handle it if Senator Fred Thompson ended up making a run for the White House (long story short: don’t count on seeing D.A. Arthur Branch show up on any episodes during the campaign…and that goes for re-runs, too), but the majority of his time was spent answering questions about whether or not the original “Law & Order” would beat “Gunsmoke” for the longest-running drama in television history.

“I sure hope so,” admits Wolf. “I think that the show is going through one of its major renovations of the past 10 years. Jeremy (Sisto) is joining the cast. I think it was this year’s cast, in a sense, (but) I’m pleased to announce that Linus Roache will also be joining as the new prosecutor. So the show has a very different look than it had two years ago. I think that Sam (Waterston) is going to be a terrific DA, but if you look at a cast that, as I said, two seasons ago had Sam as the chief prosecutor, Fred as the DA, and Dennis Farina as essentially the lead cop and you look at the way it’s going to look this year, that is a very, very large shift and also a very deliberate shift to hopefully reignite or further penetrate a younger demo. The show has been skewing older, and we would love it to skew a little bit younger.”

Sisto and Roache, together again? Two “Kidnapped” alumni on “Law & Order”…? “I thought ‘Kidnapped’ was an incredibly well produced show,” says Wolf. “Shows that may not have necessarily worked are very rarely the fault of the actors.” There’s not much that can be said about Roache’s character – he was only signed right before Wolf made the announcement, apparently – but Sisto at least acknowledged that his “L&O” character is completely different from his role on “Kidnapped.”

Continue reading »

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑