Category: Actresses (Page 205 of 258)

TCA Press Tour: IFC Gives You “The Business”…oh, yeah, and “Jackie Woodman,” too.

Sorry, that subject line sounds dismissive. I think Laura Kightlinger is hilarious, don’t get me wrong – in fact, she was throwing out great lines left and right during the IFC panel – but I just didn’t really get into the episodes of “The Minor Accomplishments of Jackie Woodman” that I screened…but, y’know, it’s probably just something to do with me being really sexist. On the other hand, however, I absolutely fell in love with “The Business,” which would explain why I was so excited to ask a few questions of Kathleen Robertson on this panel.

Robertson said that the opening credit sequence of “The Business,” where the cast sings and dances, was fun but scary because “I had to actually sing! It was typical in sort of the style that we shoot which is — Phil just basically came up to me one day and said, ‘You’re going into that room and you have to sing this song,’ like in 5 minutes, and I had to learn it. But it’s great for the show. It’s clever. We create these things on sort of a spontaneous, low budget, that it’s amazing what comes out of it.”

Robertson wasn’t willing to offer up any experiences she’d personally gone through with real life Vics, Tonys, or Rufuses, but she did confirm that, while the characters might seem extreme or heightened, “they’re not. There really is a Vic; there really is a Tony.” When pressed, however, she did finally relate a disturbing Hollywood anecdote of her own. “I probably shouldn’t be saying it without thinking about it,” she began, “but I did a movie in Bulgaria, and I showed up for the first night and there was a huge party that the producers were throwing and there were about eight girls that walked in, and they were about 12, and they were — they were basically gifts to the actors. Not particularly funny, but pretty gross.” (Quizzing her about specifics proved pointless; she merely smirked and replied, “I don’t remember the movie or the actors.”)

As far as who inspires her own character, Robertson unabashedly called out the show’s producer, Brandi Ann Milbradt. “Brandi is an independent film producer,” explained Robertson, “and my character coincidentally is an independent film producer. I was kind of pulling clothes off of her back and watching the way she would move and walk and her energy, and her personality is really sort of strong and really interesting, and she has all of these sort of interesting behavioral things, and I just kind of stole them. I kind of stole from her, and I also sort of — you know, female executives and female writers and producers and directors, unfortunately there aren’t as many as we wish and we hope that there will be in the future. You sort of have to look — I mean it’s so rare that you work with a female producer or director still in this day and age. It seems crazy, but that was one of the things that sort of drew me to the character and interested me about her, because I think that the sort of plights a young woman who wants to be a producer in this industry is very sort of different than what it is if you’re a man, unfortunately, still.”

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour: A little TBS, a little TNT…

You might be skeptical about a sitcom starring a former participant in the Blue Collar Comedy Tour, but, based on what we saw of “The Bill Engvall Show,” it looks at least a little bit better than the average family comedy, and you can thank the cast for that, I think. In addition to Engvall, you get Nancy Travis, Tim Meadows, and Steve Hytner.

Who’s Steve Hytner, you ask?


He looks familiar, but you can’t place him, right? Probably his most immortal role was that of Kenny Bania on “Seinfeld,” but he also had a really funny show called “Working,” where he co-starred along with Fred Savage. (I asked him if he’d heard anything about it coming out on DVD, but despite his excitement at the mere thought of such a thing happening, he admitted that, no, he hadn’t heard a thing.)

Anyway, the show comes across as a very sweet look at family life without getting too saccharine, mainstream without being too generic…and, hopefully, it’ll work better than, say, “The Jeff Foxworthy Show,” which its star doesn’t exactly remember with great fondness.

“I was on his show,” recalls Engvall, “and he would come to work, and I would say, ‘Oh, I can’t wait till I get my own show. I cannot wait.’ And he goes, ‘Why do you want this?’ And I go, ‘Because this is the ultimate achievement.’ And I think the reason he did not have a great experience is because that particular network didn’t get him. They didn’t know where to put him, what to do with him. And this is where I give TBS all of the credit in the world. They got me. They got what I do. And they’ve let me — they’ve put me in a vehicle that allows me to be Bill, and it’s — so for me, as bad as Jeff’s experience was, mine has been ten times the good way, you know, just from — our set — I wish you guys could all come down to the set, because one of my favorite things to hear is that people, like from guest stars to — it’s a fun set. We have a great time. We laugh. We cut up. And we do a great show. And I will give credit to James Widdoes for this, because he helps keep this — even when things got a little tense, he was there to not only make a great show, but to also — it was fun. You wanted to come to work. It was a great time. So I’m sorry that Jeff had a bad experience, but this has been just completely wicked!”

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour: It’s Showtime!

So I’m officially more than 24 hours behind at this point. So sue me. (Note to readers: this is, in fact, should not be considered to be a legitimate suggestion that you incur legal action towards either myself or PremiumHollywood.com.)

Anyway, I enjoyed four consecutive Showtime panels – “Dexter,” “Weeds,” “Brotherhood,” and “Californication” – and, frankly, what I got out of it was that I really ought to be subscribing to Showtime rather than HBO. I know, them’s bold words, but it’s true. “The Sopranos” and “Deadwood” are both gone ’til their respective creators get off their respective arses and put together movies, “John in Cincinnati” hasn’t done anything for me as of yet, “Tell Me You Love Me” is officially the running joke of the press tour (although, to be fair, I haven’t actually seen it yet, personally), and God bless ’em, but “Curb Your Enthusiasm” and “Flight of the Conchords” are both funny shows that will inevitably come out of on DVD, at which point I watch them at my discretion. Meanwhile, Showtime is offering new series like “Californication,” returning series like “Dexter,” “Weeds,”” and “Brotherhood,” and, in the future, will be bringing back “The Tudors” and “This American Life.”‘

Seriously, what’s not to like about Showtime?

Anyway, here are some highlights:

Dexter:

* Michael J. Hall describes the world of his character, the serial-killing Dexter, as “pretty rocked.” Expect him to encounter an unexpected visitor, says Hall, “someone who sees him for who he is, accepts him as such, and he really has no choice but to do him in. And so, yeah, I think — I think when we meet Dexter at the top of season two, he’s still reeling from that, and — and any footing he’s able to establish for himself is pretty much immediately pulled out from under him.”

Executive producer Clyde Phillips explains, “We’re sort of playing the beginning of the season, picking up obviously where the first season left off. And then, it’s maybe four or five weeks later in the world in which these characters inhabit. So all of the emotional resonance of what each of them went through, particularly with what Dexter went through, will continue as if that were the actual passage of time, so they’re still dented and rocked by what has happened.” (Adds fellow associate producer Daniel Cerone, “The nice thing with Dexter is it’s actually the lack of emotional resonance. So in episode one of the second season, he discovers his sort of emotional vacancy and his reaction to the death of his brother.”)

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour: Relative Relaxation ’til Showtime

Howdy do. So yesterday was a bit of a wind-down day for me, thankfully…and good thing, too. I needed it. After running from panel to panel, then doing the obligatory schmoozefest at the end of the evening, only to return to my room and write for an hour or two, was getting a little exhausting, and I was really starting to feel it. (I know, I probably lessened the amount of sympathy I might otherwise have gotten by referencing the schmoozefest aspect of my day, but at least I was honest.)

The day started with a trio of Disney Channel panels: “The Wizards of Waverly Place,” “High School Musical: The Music in You,” and the long-awaited-by-just-about-every-kid-you-know “High School Musical 2.” “The Wizards of Waverly Place” seems cute enough, a standard Disney sitcom about two teenagers who are training to be wizards; not really my cup of tea, but if I was a kid, I’d imagine that the blending of teen comedy and “Harry Potter” – because, c’mon, who are we kidding, that’s what inspired this – would be something I’d want to check out. As far as “High School Musical 2,” I admit it: I’ve never seen the first one. That said, though, the songs they played from the sequel were immediately endearing and catchy, and the choreography was fantastic, so, God help me, maybe I should go check out the original before this new one premieres. Ultimately, though, the far more interesting program was “High School Musical: The Music in You,” a documentary by Academy Award winning documentarian Barbara Kopple (“Harlan County USA,” “American Dream”) which details two rival high schools who are putting on their own renditions of “High Schol Musical.” As a music geek, I was most fascinated / depressed by the information about how expensive it is to stage one of these productions, simply as far as paying the publishing royalties. I never thought about that before…but, geez, you can see that these people certainly do…

Julia Worthington, one of the teachers putting on the musical, explained that “it depends on, first of all, how many performances you’re going to do, the size of your venue.” Worthington’s school’s production usually only has an audience of about 100, and, based on that average, she says that “the licensing and the royalties and everything was about $2,300.” Apparently, the amount started at around $500, and it varies wildly depending on the number of seats, the number of performances, and so forth…but, of course, that’s only for “High School Musical.”

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour: Don’t panic, here’s “General Hospital: Night Shift”

If you’re looking for the transcript of the “General Hospital: Night Shift” panel, sorry, I had to yank it. As a new member of the Television Critics Association, I committed the cardinal sin of not studying the bylaws as well as perhaps I should have, and I didn’t realize that the posting of transcripts is more than a little bit frowned upon. I’ll work on pulling together some highlights of the event in a slightly different format, but, for now, it’ll remain MIA.

Sorry!

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑