Author: Will Harris (Page 175 of 261)

Will is a member of the Television Critics Association and has written for Decider.com, the Onion A.V. Club, The Dissolve, Indiewire, Rhino.com, TV Week Magazine, The Virginian-Pilot, Popdose.com, and EW.com along with writing for Bullz-Eye.com and Premium Hollywood.

TCA Press Tour: Can a Friday night timeslot save “Friday Night Lights”?

We’ll see. But I’m sure we’re all thinking approximately the same thing about this move: aren’t most of the people who’d want to watch a show about a high school football team the same people who, on Friday nights, are actually going out to see real high school football teams play? Surely that’s occurred to someone at NBC. Maybe they just figure that this is a show that people like enough to record and watch when they get home; the question is, will that result in enough viewership to save the series beyond this second year?

Half the problem, of course, is that everyone thinks “Friday Night Lights” is just about football. It’s not. Well, not entirely, anyway. Additionally, it’s the story of small-town America, and arguably one of the most realistic ever seen on television; maybe that’s why NBC decided to stick with it for a second season. At the very least, it’s certainly why they’ve been going out of their way to trumpet the “it’s not just about football” thing in their ads for Year 2.

“The network has been so supportive of the show from the beginning,” says Executive Producer Jason Katims. “And, you know, we’re sitting here today because they’ve been so supportive. And we’re not really trying to change the show. And what we mean to say — you know, we’re not saying it’s not a show about football. We think this is a show that is for everybody, that should reach a female audience as well. And I think it’s been — it’s been a challenge to — for women to know that they would like the show because of the football thing. And that’s the thing that we’re trying to sort of overcome. That’s really about marketing.”

For those who were watching last season, the producers have decided on a not-entirely-surprising tactic by fast-forwarding eight months…to the next football season. As a result, Connie Britton’s character – Tami Taylor, Coach Taylor’s wife – will be having her baby in the season premiere.

“It was really an exciting idea for us to start eight months later,” says Katims, “because we…we love the idea of all the stuff that’s gone on in those intervening eight months and picking up people in the middle of things. We’re starting out of the gate with Tami going to have this baby in the first episode. And suddenly she’s in Austin with this infant — I mean
she’s dealing with this infant and with a 16-year-old daughter who is acting out more than she ever has before. And Coach Taylor is coaching at TMU in Austin, and this idea of this long-distance relationship that seemed like a great idea at the time suddenly doesn’t seem like such a great idea. And they’re wondering whether they made the biggest mistake of their lives.”

Katims didn’t offer up specifics, but he did allow that the Coach wouldn’t be at TMU for the entire season. (Actually, his initial claim, which brought considerable laughter from the crowd, was that the entire TMU storyline “was a contractual request from Kyle, and it has to be at least five episodes.” Connie Britton kidded, “He’s such a diva.”)

TCA Press Tour: Fantastic “Journeyman”? Well, the potential’s there, anyway…

When it comes to movies and TV series that involve time travel, there’s really only one way to approach them: turn off your mind and enjoy them for the entertainment that they are (or, at least, should be). If you start trying to work out what’s a paradox and what’s not, you’ll get a headache and, more importantly, you won’t be able to enjoy the fun. Not that “Journeyman” is really about the fun; it is – what a shock – a bit dark, blending sci-fi, mystery, and romance, offering up just enough of an intriguing premise to get you curious, but maybe not enough to keep you tuning in for the long haul. Not unless they start offering up some answers pretty quickly, that is.

Oh, but you’re wondering about the concept.

So says the original press release: “”Dan Vasser thought he had it all: a loving wife, a great son and a steady job. But life suddenly throws him a curve ball. Dan finds himself traveling into the past with a purpose – impacting people’s lives for the better – and sometimes the worse. While doing so, Dan reconnects with Livia Beale, his ex-fiancée, whom he lost in a mysterious plane crash. Now armed with the knowledge of the present, will he be able to save her? What would that mean to his own future? And how would it change a man who thought he had it all?”

Great idea. And not at all like “The Time Travelers’ Wife.”

Okay, that’s unfair. And, besides, producer Kevin Falls swears on a stack of bibles that he’s never read the book.

“I am one of these guys who always kind of wishes he could do everything over,” he explains, “and it has a lot to do with the disasterous dating pattern. And I was at a dinner party the other night, and we all started talking about who had Googled old girlfriends or boyfriends, and, like, everybody at this party said they had. And it just started getting me on that road of people sometimes wondering if their life had taken a different course. And I thought, what could be the ultimate love story where he has to, like — where the character has to straddle two different families in a way that feels epic. And I thought being married to somebody he loves, and then he travels at a time where he has a fiancee that may have been his soul mate, and it’s like, “Now what am I going to do?”‘ And that’s kind of the genesis of it.

“But,” he adds, “I hope that people love the book enough to go, ‘Okay, this might totally be the kind of thing that I would be interested in.'”

At the very least, it certainly interested Kevin McKidd, who you may recognize from his role as Lucius on “Rome.” I don’t know why people love that show,” he says of his former gig…but he is willing to theorize.

“I think it’s that it’s not a generic, standard, straightforward TV show…in the same way that ‘Journeyman’ isn’t. You are not going to just go and get the same meal every Monday night or Sunday night when ‘Rome’ was on. It changed, and the stories would change. And there would be — one episode would be an event episode, and the next episode would have a different slant and a different balance and a different focus instead of it being generic and, you know, the three-act structure. TV doesn’t work that way. But I think, getting back to ‘Journeyman,’ since that’s what we are here for, I think that’s one of the things I love. I mean, in a way, when I looked at ‘Journeyman,’ I felt that seems like a logical next step for me because, having gone from a show like ‘Rome,’ which is so event-style TV that’s very of its own, it would feel like a step back to me to kind of go into a cop drama or something much more box standard, you know, I mean, not being disrespectful to any of those shows because they are all well-made and fantastic classmen. But, for me,
‘Journeyman’ just felt like, you know, very — very interesting and emotional and truthful, and yet it sparked the imagination for me as an actor.”

The pilot episode of “Journeyman” – which, as we all know, may or may not be what we actually end up seeing on the air come the fall – is a little confusing at times, but, as noted, the show crosses several different genres; plus, it’s scored the sweet post-“Heroes” timeslot, which will surely work in its favor. That’s right, NBC has finally realized that they need to provide a proper follow-up for “Heroes”…and given that the show’s lead-in is “Chuck,” we’ve actually got the first all-sci-fi (more or less) night of TV in years. I know, I’m a geek, but I don’t care: I’m psyched!

P.S. On the subject of paradoxes and the long-standing sci-fi rule on time travel where if you change one thing, you change everything, Falls says simply, “Yeah, I don’t think it’s been proven.”

TCA Press Tour: Oh, Christ, not “The Singing Bee”…

Yes, “The Singing Bee.” And, yes, Joey Fatone.

Look, I’ll tell ya: Joey Fatone’s a hell of a nice guy. I ended up talking to him for a few minutes at NBC’s rooftop party a few nights ago, and he couldn’t have been any more gracious. But, honestly, his show is pretty damned stupid. Not that it’s Fatone’s fault. I mean, it’s a hosting gig, he’s giving it all the charisma he can muster, and he does a fine job at it, but that can’t compensate for a show that requires people to sing – often very, very badly – the lyrics from a random song. It might be doing well enough in the ratings to have been picked up for the fall season, but I just have to believe that it’s because it’s the whole car-wreck scenario, where you know you shouldn’t watch, yet you find you can’t look away.

Even more bizarre to me, though, is that it’s not even the only show of its type on the air; Fox has got one almost exactly like it! Executive Producer Phil Gurin swears, however, that he had his idea first. “We’ve had ours in development for quite awhile,” he assures us, and he’s not bitter than Fox is, even coincidentally, stealing a little bit of their thunder. Fatone, meanwhile, started making (fake) claims that he was bitter at the Fox show’s host, Wayne Brady.

“He’s a good friend of mine, and I can’t believe he did that to me,” said Fatone. “It pissed me off really badly.” Then, of course, he grinned and said, “Just kidding. I called him right before I was coming to shoot the show. He’s, like,, ‘Congratulations on ‘Dancing With the Stars.’ I’m so proud of you.’ I said, ‘That’s cool. I heard you’re doing a similar show. We’re kind of like doing this kind of like singing thing.’ He’s, like, ‘Oh, yeah, I heard you’re doing it. Good luck and congratulations with that.’ He was actually really happy — he was genuinely happy. It doesn’t matter. We’re really friends. We actually went to the same high school together. He did the ‘Beetlejuice’ show as well in Orlando (at Universal Studios). The funny thing was, after it aired, I haven’t got back to him yet, (but) he called me. He was actually calling me up and saying, ‘Hey, congratulations. I’m really proud of you.’ That’s what it was. Hopefully he wasn’t trying to kick my butt. I mean, he’s a great guy. He’s a really good friend of mine. It’s actually a friendly competition kind of thing.”

I say good luck to both Fatone and Brady. But I’m not going to be watching either show. Still, I do have to make an admission: they did a version of the show at the aforementioned NBC rooftop party where they used a mixture of TCA members (no, not me) and actors from new NBC series as contestants, and it was a blast to watch live. (And if you’re wondering, Zachary Levi from “Chuck” was triumphant, soundly kicking the arses of all comers.)

TCA Press Tour: You’re up, “Chuck.”

I don’t know why NBC is so insistent about calling its new show, “Chuck,” a drama. It’s not a drama. It might have hints of drama; ultimately, though, it’s an action-comedy…with considerable emphasis on the comedy, thanks to the tag-team efforts of Zachary Levi and Joshua Gomez. You might know Levi from his work on the ABC comedy, “Less than Perfect”…but, then again, as Levi himself admits, you may not. (When referencing the show during the panel, he began by saying, “For anybody who watched ‘Less Than Perfect’…so, what, probably 5 or 10 of you…?”) Gomez, however, comes off stints on “Invasion” and “Without A Trace,” but even without a solid comedic background, he nonetheless comes across a lot like Seth Green on coke. (That’s a good thing…or, at least, I think it is, anyway.)

In the long run, though, most people will be interested in “Chuck” because it’s the handiwork of Josh Schwartz, late of “The O.C..” Certainly, that was the case with several of the reporters in attendance, one of whom brought up the fact that Chuck works in a Best-Buy-like store, then asked, “Is the store big enough that it will one day have a stage on which indie bands can perform?”

“Absolutely,” said Schwartz, with a grin. “In-store promotion, we’ll get it done.”

Going on, however, Schwartz made it clear what appealed to him about “Chuck.” “After ‘The O.C.,’ I was definitely looking to do something that would have more of a genre element to it, but still be able to do it in the style in which I like to write and the kind of characters that I very much enjoy. And Chris (Fedak, co-producer) and I, we went to film school together. We sat down, and he had the initial concept for the show, which I thought was really interesting and could also
be really funny and would give us really the spine we needed to tell this story and to do it in a way that could speak to the ‘quarter-life’ crisis that our character of Chuck is undergoing and also be able to do it with a lot of humor as well.”

Speaking of humor, it’s clear that Levi learned quite a few comedic chops while on “Less Than Perfect,” whether anyone was watching it or not. When asked if he considered himself to be smart (if not necessarily as smart as his character), Levi responded, “He went to Stanford and is this crazy brain of a guy and can figure out algorithms. I can’t even spell
‘algorithm.’ I always have the excuse that I would’ve gone to college if I had applied myself. So, no, I’m not as smart as Chuck…but I like to think I’m decent, right? Maybe? I hope!”

Executive producer McG (he was behind the “Charlie’s Angels” movies, you know) went on to acknowledge that “Chuck” owes a certain debt to the work of William Gibson…if not necessarily the film version of “Johnny Mnemonic.” “It’s called a seminal performance of Keanu Reeves,” McG said, with a laugh, before explaining that he’s had a long association with that film’s AD staff, who used to tell horror stories about the difficulty of the shoot.

As the panel wrapped up, Schwartz was asked if there was anything he might’ve learned from his experiences on “The O.C.” that he would make a point of not repeating on “Chuck.”

“What are you implying?” he snapped. Then, after offering a smile, he admitted that he’d learned quite a lot during his time on the show. “‘The “O.C.’ was my first experience doing anything that was, you know, out there. It was a great experience, but it was also a tremendous learning experience. So there’s a lot of things that I will take from that and apply here.

“I think most of all, it’s staying focused on the work itself and not trying to worry about all the other things. We have a great group of people that we’re doing the show with. I’m really fortunate to work with Chris and McG and we’re having a blast making this show, and that’s the thing I just real wanted to be able to stay focused on.”

TCA Press Tour: You know who needs his own talk show? The head of security from “The Jerry Springer Show.”

Okay, maybe Steve Wilkos doesn’t need his own show. But despite the inevitable skepticism that will result from viewers who cannot and will not disassociate Wilkos from his former employer, the brief look we got at “The Steve Wilkos Show” found a show much more rooted in the territory of folks like Montel Williams or Maury Povich. (Okay, maybe I should specify “early Maury Povich”; that guy’s practically another Springer these days.) Wilkos, a former Marine and a longtime veteran of the Chicago Police Department, doesn’t appear to be going for sensationalism; he seriously comes across as a guy who just wants to use his public forum to help people, and it’s hard not to root for someone with such a goal.

Mind you, it was a little disconcerting that the panel seemed to be led much more by the show’s executive producer, Richard Dominick, than by Wilkos himself. Once in awhile, though, Wilkos managed to get a word in edgewise…and, perhaps inevitably, much of that time was spent defining the considerable differences between himself and the show he’s just left.

“There are no similarities,” stated Wilkos, definitively. “You know, ‘The Jerry Springer Show’ was a crazy circus and, believe me, I’m going to miss working on that show because for 14 years…you know, I never considered it work. I went, and I had a great time, and I had fun with the guys. It was a lot of fun. But this is…when you are a policeman, you have to take it more seriously. And this show is dealing with people that are coming to me, calling the show, and asking for help. And we are going to try to help these people.”

But surely people will look at you and say, “Hey, it’s that dude from ‘The Jerry Springer Show,'” yes…?

“Hey, you know what? People are going to say that,” admits Wilkos. “People are going to do that. But (once) they tune in and they start watching my show, then they’ll get it. And some people have gotten it. They’ve seen, when I hosted ‘The Jerry Springer Show,’ especially the last 20 or 30 that I hosted, we didn’t do the typical Springer show. Like, we did this show on a guy where he was abusing his wife, the girl living with the guy in the van. And there was actually a really great
response, where people were like, ‘Wow, can you help me?’ So I think doing the show going forward, when people are always going to associate with me with Springer, which is fine with me, because I love Jerry and I loved working on his show. But my show is not ‘The Jerry Springer Show.’ It’s going to be completely different.”

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑