Author: Will Harris (Page 167 of 261)

Will is a member of the Television Critics Association and has written for Decider.com, the Onion A.V. Club, The Dissolve, Indiewire, Rhino.com, TV Week Magazine, The Virginian-Pilot, Popdose.com, and EW.com along with writing for Bullz-Eye.com and Premium Hollywood.

Bullz-Eye’s 2007 Fall TV Preview

I’d just like to begin by stating for the record that, in Bullz-Eye’s 2006 Fall TV Preview, I made the following statement about “Heroes”:

“The premise is fantastic, and the gradual unfolding of the various stories will keep viewers coming back week after week. This is gonna be the water-cooler show of the season.”

That’s right. I’m Nostradamus.

And, like that famous French forecaster of the future, I get at least as many wrong as I get right, like, for instance, these:

1. Ugly Betty: “Expect fans of the original show to be horrified at this poor translation. In fact, it’s hard to imagine that anyone other than girls on the cusp of pubescence or desperately single women in their 20s and 30s will be able to stand this for even 30 minutes. Oh, and did I mention that it’s an hour long?”
2. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: “Best cast on television, hands down… and to have their dialogue written by someone who’s arguably one of the best scribes in the medium? I’m sold. And America will be, too.”
3. Twenty Good Years: “‘Arrested Development’ proved that (Jeffrey) Tambor doesn’t draw the ratings, but Lithgow does. It might not be a huge hit, but count on it doing well enough to stick around for a few seasons.”

Oh, well. At least I was right about “Happy Hour.”

This year’s crop is another blend that’s heavy on drama, light on comedy, and thankfully light on reality shows – well, unless you’re Fox, that is – but, as ever, we must provide the following caveat to the feature that follows:

What we’re offering are our impressions and opinions of what are essentially “rough drafts” of the season’s new shows. Mind you, most aren’t very rough at all — indeed, some may actually look identical when they make their official network premieres — but, nonetheless, it’s not unheard of for producers to retool and recast their shows between the filming of the original pilot and the actual premiere of the series. Actually, this year, it’s closer to the rule than the exception, but we’ll get to that in a moment.

Basically, the moral is this: use our descriptions as an approximation of what will end up on the air, not as The Gospel According to Bullz-Eye.

And now that that’s out of the way, let’s warm up the set and head over to the homepage for Bullz-Eye’s Fall TV Preview.

There’s quick on the draw…and then there’s Fox.

I just finished writing my Fall TV Preview piece for Bullz-Eye, only to find that Fox has already canceled the first-debuting of its new series, “Anchorwoman,” after only one episode!

Well, since I guess there’s no point in including it in my preview now, here’s what I HAD written about the show…

Anchorwoman (Wednesday, August 22 @ 8:00 PM, Fox)

Starring: Lauren Jones, Phil Hurley, Annalisa Petralia, Dan Delgado, Michelle Reese
Producers: Brian Gadinsky, Josh Bingham, Chad Damiani, J.P. Lavin
Network’s Description: Phil Hurley is the owner of a middle-market Texas news station, KYTX Channel 19. Willing to do anything to get viewers to tune in to his newscasts in a highly competitive local market, Phil has shocked the station and town of Tyler, Texas, by bringing in a gorgeous model and ex-WWE diva with no previous news experience to be his next anchorwoman. Former Miss New York and über-vixen Lauren Jones packs up her Versace dresses and heads to Tyler to start a new career. Can this bombshell make it as a serious reporter? Will she save KYTX, or make it the laughingstock of the Lone Star State? Lauren wants to show everyone she’s no airhead, and this is her big chance to prove she’s more than just a pretty face. The entire newsroom thinks the boss has made a giant mistake. Reigning anchor Annalisa Petralia is not about to lose her Queen Bee status to some L.A. hottie. News Director Dan Delgado is fit to be tied, fearful his beloved journalistic standards will go out the window. Michelle Reese, a hard-nosed reporter bound for CNN, will take no prisoners. Lauren has a big job in front of her as she struggles to fit in with her news team and an unfamiliar town.
The Buzz: Given that this is the network that brought you Paris and Nicole living “The Simple Life,” Fox is as good a place as any for this “reality sitcom.” As you watch the show, though, and see how completely and totally clueless Jones is when she arrives at KYTX, you can’t help but feel that the percentage of actual reality within “Anchorwoman” is pretty slim.
Pilot Highlight: The frustration and unabashed disgust of the KYTX crew as they watch Jones flail and fumble her way through her trial run at the news desk, a train wreck which ends with her blowing a kiss at the camera.
Bottom Line: There are laughs here, but this feels like something that’s been sitting on a shelf for several years rather than a new series. It’s probably starting early because Fox expects it’ll end early as well.

Will’s official score for calling the fall season: 1 for 1.

Further into the final frontier – “Star Trek: Year Four”

As we wait with bated breath for every single development – no matter how small – on J.J. Abrams’ new motion picture take on “Star Trek,” the folks over at IDW Publishing have given us something to keep us occupied: a new comic series which explores in the fourth year of the U.S.S. Enterprise’s five-year mission. (You know: the one immediately after the original TV show got cancelled?)

I picked up the first issue, and…well, I’m still on the fence. I’m both a Trek geek and a comic geek from way back (though I’ve found that it’s not exactly something that’s healthy to bring up in social settings), so I’ve read just about every excursion that Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and company have taken within the pages of the comic-book medium, so maybe I’m just spoiled from having read their adventures as written by such sci-fi luminaries as Peter David, Howard Weinstein, and the like. This first story, though, really feels thin to me…though I think that may be because writer David Tischman has tried so hard to reproduce the feel of an original episode of the show down to the very last detail. On that level, he’s unquestionably successful.

There’s definitely fun to be had by flipping through the pages and seeing backdrops (courtesy of artist Steve Conley) which recall the matte-painting landscapes of the show, and, by the 7th page, a red-shirted crewman has bit the dust, which, tragic or not, will still inspire a chuckle from longtime fans; on a similar note, the inclusion of “Trek” animated series figures into the mix – stand up, please, Lieutenants M’Ress and Arex – will bring a knowing grin to the faces of those who recognize them. I may have even laughed out loud when Tischman gave Kirk the following line: “Even amidst all this scientific wonder, I’ll always appreciate the company of a beautiful woman.” (Get ‘er, Jim!)

Despite all of these moments, though, when you reach the end of the 22-page story, I couldn’t help but feel that a filmed version of the tale wouldn’t have lasted more than about a half-hour. I think that might be the result of Conley opting to go for a widescreen effect with his panels rather than making them into smaller blocks which could’ve included more dialogue. Your mileage on this part may vary, but, personally, there’s just not enough spoken interaction between the characters for my liking. (Informal conversations between the crew are invariably my favorite moments of any “Trek” episode or film; it always feels as though they flesh out the characterization, no matter how well we may feel that we know these people.)

Of course, I’ll still pick up the second issue of “Star Trek: Year Four,” anyway, but I had hoped to be a bit more enthused by reading the first of these heretofore-unrevealed “Trek” tales; by the end of this issue, I was admittedly entertained, but I wasn’t nearly as impressed as I’d hoped to be.

ABC’s “Masters of Science Fiction”

I swear, it’s just coincidence that the last several postings have been sci-fi related, but even with that being the case, I’d still like to talk for a few moments about ABC’s new summer replacement series, an anthology called “Masters of Science Fiction.”

I’d heard a little bit about it from the show’s publicist before I headed out to the TCA Press Tour in July; it sounded interesting (although, obviously, tempting me with a science-fiction concept is akin to shooting fish in a barrel), and it had a phenomenal list of contributing actors (Malcolm McDowell, Anne Heche, Sam Waterston, Judy Davis, Terry O’Quinn, Elizabeth Rohm, Brian Dennehy, and John Hurt are just some of the folks involved), so, naturally, when the publicist offered up a review copy, I was ready to roll. Unfortunately, it didn’t arrive before my departure to L.A. for the tour, so I didn’t get to check it out until my return…and even more unfortunately, by the time I returned, I was already a bit iffy on checking it out, thanks to the words of no less than ABC’s president of entertainment, Stephen McPherson.

During ABC’s executive panel, someone asked McPherson about the origin of the series, he responded, “It was a low-cost initiative that we tried. We did this series of movies to see if there was a way to spark something different at a really low cost point. You know, I think there is some good work done there, but it’s very unseen. So it’s just been…it’s been a little bit problematic.”

Okay, now, to be fair, he’s acknowledging the “good work” inherent somewhere in the series, but his suggestion that it’s “very unseen” is a little disingenuous; after all, there were six episodes made for “Masters of Science Fiction,” and as the network’s president of entertainment, I have to think he might’ve had something to do with the fact that ABC is opting to only show four of them. Also, come on, he’s saying this stuff to critics before the series has even aired…? Way to get behind it, man!

From my perspective, however, I can now tell that you that I’ve seen the four episodes that will be airing on Saturday nights at 10 PM for the next few weeks…and, wow, if that timeslot of death doesn’t instill you with ABC’s definitive opinion of the show, I don’t know what does…and it’s nothing but a stone cold shame that they’re burying this thing. “Masters of Science Fiction” harks back to classic dramatic anthologies like “The Twilight Zone,” “The Outer Limits,” and the like. The budget might not be through the roof, but the performances are top-notch, and that goes beyond the acting; the show brings in directors like Mark Rydell (“On Golden Pond”), Michael Tolkin (“The Player”), and Jonathan Frakes (“Star Trek: First Contact”), and features adaptations of stories by Robert Heinlein (“I, Robot”), Howard Fast (“Spartacus”), and legendary sci-fi writer Harlan Ellison, who adapts his own story, collaborating with Josh Olson (“A History of Violence”).

Some folks have been dismissive of the fact that the show was done in connection with Starz, but don’t lump “Masters of Science Fiction” in with “Masters of Horror”; the latter is more about blood, guts, and cheap scares, while this is intelligent and thought-provoking drama, done with the occasional – but far from constant – wink at the viewer. Take, for instance, “The Awakening,” which stars O’Quinn (you know him as John Locke from “Lost”) as a former military man who’s called back into service when it’s suspected that aliens may be landing on Earth. The situation is sufficiently grim that the President of the United States is brought into the loop…and who plays the President? William B. Davis, a.k.a. the Cigarette Smoking Man from “The X-Files.” There’s something darkly funny about that, and you can bet that the producers were completely in on the joke. It’s also mildly amusing that the show is narrated by Professor Stephen Hawking…and, yes, I know, there’s really no way to know that it was actually Hawking doing the narration, but let’s give him the benefit of the doubt, shall we?

“Masters of Science Fiction” is quality stuff, and, honestly, I don’t see anything here that couldn’t, if given the opportunity, draw an audience, especially given the amount of familiar faces involved. Why bury it on Saturday nights at 10 PM…? I mean, I’m not telling you to blow off any existing plans you may have, but if you’re home, it’s well worth watching…and if you’re not home but you’ve got TiVo, I do recommend that you grab it and check it out later.

Oh, and if you like it as much as I did, don’t be afraid to send a nasty E-mail to Stephen McPherson and ask him why he couldn’t be bothered to set aside one of ABC’s reality show for a few weeks and give this series a halfway-decent chance at success…

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑