Author: Bob Westal (Page 256 of 265)

Writer guy Bob Westal was literally born in Hollywood and has commented on the worlds of movies, popular culture, politics, and food ever since. His interest in cocktails is more recent, but he made up for lost time with hundreds of “Drink of the Week” blog posts for Bullz-Eye. In addition to writing and editing, Bob also talks a lot.

Making Of

Bahti (Lotfi Abdelli) is a talented, girl-loving, Tunisian breakdancer and pretty much the last person you’d expect to find under the tutelage of an Islamist cleric with Al Qaeda sympathies (Lotfi Dziri), begging for a chance a shot at the suicide bombing big-time. That, however, is the precise trajectory traced by Nouri Bouzid’s astute and emotionally adept, but initially slow-moving, look at the causes of terrorism.

“Making Of” starts out as pretty much a straight-up neorealist look at the issue, as we spend time observing how limited 25 year-old Bahti’s life has become and how the U.S. invasion of Iraq provides a powerful, but ideologically confused, focus for his generalized anger. Then, just as Bahti starts to be carefully schooled on the ways of hating Westerners and despising women, the film takes a sudden meta/post-modern turn as the actor Lotfi Abdelli switches from Arabic to French, goes out of character, and begins to angrily question the nature of the film to director Bouzid, and suddenly the title becomes a self-conscious double entendre. These staged segments appear to be aimed at diffusing anger among Tunisians who prefer to deny the existence of terrorism in their homeland, as well as observant Moslems who might be insulted by the film’s respectful, yet critical, look at modern day Islam. In any case, Bouzid’s film is compelling viewing, largely because of two charismatic lead performances from Abdelli as the alienated youth and Lotfi Dziri as the low-key fanatic who indoctrinates him in the ways of hate and death. With its strong stand against terrorism and outspoken humanism, “Making Of” is a thoughtful and poignant choice for Westerners curious about exactly what is being said and thought on the so-called Arab “street.”

Click to buy “Making Of”

Comic-Con 2008: Day Three – Fringe

Especially if you wanted to see panels on such phenomenon as “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog” or “Battlestar Galictica,” getting into Comic-Con’s 4000 seat Ballroom 20 required fans to arrive significantly early, with some guests sitting through hours of events they cared little about to see the event they came to see in the first place. Such was not the case, however, if you wanted to check out the J.J. Abrams-led panel on “Fringe.”

The new show from super-creator Abrams (“Lost,” “Alias,” “Felicity”) and the co-screenwriters of Transformers as well as Abrams upcoming theatrical “Star Trek” reboot, has been the beneficiary of viral marketing and a significant amount of buzz, while also being the victim of an unauthorized Internet leak of an incomplete version of the show’s pilot. On Wednesday night, a complete version of the episode was screened as part of the Comic-Con’s preview night.

Though the pilot received good reviews from online critics for Time and MovieWeb, yours truly found those opinions fairly inexplicable. The eighty minute production slowly drains the energy from a fun and intriguing premise (what if most of what we now call pseudoscience was real science?). Though the cliche-ridden, often campy, dialogue was one problem, far worse was a dead-in-the-water performance by Anna Torv as an FBI agent racing to discover what mysterious force killed all of a plane’s passengers and is now severely endangering her coworker/lover (John Valley). “Fringe” also features Joshua Jackson (“Dawson’s Creek,” “The Skulls”) as a cynical adventurer/scientist and John Noble (ultimate bad dad Denethor in LOTR) as his father — an actual mad scientist…or possibly merely an eccentric one. Not surprisingly, Noble steals all his scenes.

Still, who cares what I think? It’s the judgment of fans that counts for team Abrams. But, with Comic-Con attendees apparently voting with their feet, it was the job of the panel, moderated by Television Week‘s Joe Adalian, to make that half-empty auditorium feel half-full. All the principles were on hand, including the three stars, Abrams, and writers Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci (“Transformers,” “Star Trek”). Abrams did most of the talking and, while the mood was upbeat on the surface, damage control was under way. Later on, when an audience member praised the pilot, declaring it “awesome,” two or three audience pairs of hands out of some two thousand applauded.

Continue reading »

Comic-Con 2008: Day Three – Dollhouse

Of course, the “Dollhouse” event was a love fest. Actually, a mega-love fest.

That’s absolutely no surprise if you know anything at all about the kind of admiration (both lusty and talent-wise) aroused by star Eliza Dushku (“Tru Calling,” “Bring it On”) and the Bono-esque stature of multi-hyphenate series creator Joss Whedon (“Buffy, the Vampire Slayer,” “Firefly“) across a huge swath of Geektopia — a swath recently made even larger by the net-success of his second acclaimed genre-blending musical, “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog.” Add to that the appearance of Dushku’s excessively handsome costar, Tahmoh Penikett of “Battlestar Galactica” (a show with a few gazillion ardent fans of its own) and you have fanboy and fangirl critical mass.

And, indeed, the first three quarters of the panel was loaded with silliness, over-the-top praise, jokey-silly putdowns (a Whedon trademark) and flirtatious asides between the three folks onstage as well as with the audience. Topics early on included the peripatetic Ms. Dushku’s trips to such locales as Iran, where she survived a “terrorist attack” from some errant Persian rugs.

Moving to a Q&A, the first question was about the source of the premise of “Dollhouse,” in which Dushku will play an “active,” a sort of human blank slate who is downloaded with a new personality and skill set for each new assignment, with jobs that range from from pre-tailored love/sex object to hyper-skilled operative. The show appears to take place in a world much like our own, and this sort of thing sure sounds highly illegal, not to mention extremely immoral, and BSG’s Pennikett will play a cop wondering just why this beautiful woman he keeps meeting never seems to be the same person twice. The show is currently set to premiere this January.

Continue reading »

Comic-Con 2008: Day Three – The Simpsons

As mentioned near the start of this panel, “The Simpsons” has pretty much beat every other prime-time television show in terms of longevity, number of episodes, etc. — except for “Gunsmoke” and “Lassie,” which also makes it the all-time king of sitcoms with a reservoir of goodwill able to withstand more than one below-par season. This appearance by the show’s main creative team was a predictably relaxed and mirthful affair in which creator Matt Groening and writers Al Jean and Matt Selman did most of the talking — quieter panelists included director David Silverman, who helmed “The Simpsons Movie,” and writer Carolyn Omine.

Before the official start of the panel, Groening introduced some clips from next Fall’s “Treehouse of Horror” episode, including a brief segment involving Homer Simpson and a particularly violent form of vote rigging that goes well beyond the worst imagingings of Diebold-fearing liberals, as well as a spot on parody of “It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown” with a Linus-like Milhouse accidentally tricking the supernatural pumpkin into a form of vegetarian cannibalism. (It’s complicated.)

Wasting no time, the event was immediately thrown open to questions. The first young questioner asked if the long-suffering Marge Simpson, tiring from her numerous attempts to get the permanently obese Homer to lose weight, would start gaining weight herself. The writers’
response was they would promptly steal the idea and that it would likely show up in a Simpsons comic book, if not the actual show.

Another question referred to a recent episode parodying the comic book world featuring an appearance by mad comic writing genius Alan Moore (“Watchmen,” “V for Vendetta,” “From Hell”) and a joke about an animated “Watchmen Babies” series. Writer Matt Selman expressed his own intimidation at working with the artistically and personally imposing Moore, who apparently got the joke but also stipulated that the gag itself was also an example of an evil corporation (this is Fox, after all) debasing one of Moore’s creations.

Continue reading »

Icons of Adventure

Starting in the late fifties and on through the seventies, England’s low budget Hammer film studios became known for a series of profitable reboots of classic gothic horror franchises, but the busy film studio actually produced all kinds of movies. This two-disc set gives us a mixed-bag of thrillers bringing the mean, lean, and graphic (by early sixties standards) Hammer touch to pulpy adventure yarns as well as featuring the considerable acting skills of go-to bad guy/monster man Christopher Lee as the chief villain of three of the four pictures.

The set gets off to an unfortunate start with “The Pirates of Blood River” — an insufferable bore thanks to some plodding pacing and an insipid performance by leading man Kerwin Matthews — Lee’s bad guy pirate, no Jack Sparrow, can only do so much. Fortunately, there’s more of Lee, actual ships, swordfights, and all-around piratical fun in “The Devil Ship Pirates.” The second disc brings us a pair of politically and ethnically suspect flicks set in English colonies. “The Terror of the Tongs” is a casting nightmare from the point of view of ethnic sensitivity, with innumerable Hong Kong Chinese characters played by English, French and, in one shocking instance, an actual Chinese actor. (Burt Kwouk – Kato from the original “Pink Panther” films — who, naturally, is killed five minutes into the movie). Still, it’s a surprisingly nasty and perversely entertaining film with some amazing low-budget production values and another strong bad guy performance from Christopher Lee (no relation to Bruce), speaking perfect English in a sort of practice run for his later performances as super-unPC villain Fu Manchu.

If “Terror” is the set’s Harold, “The Stranglers of Bombay” is it’s Anglocentric Kumar. It’s an fitfully entertaining, occasionally creepy tale of a stalwart British officer (Guy Rolfe) fighting Indian thuggees – those fanatical, kill-crazy bad guys who tried to overrun British India in “Gunga Din,” tried to off Harrison Ford and friends in “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” and who, led by Leo “Rumpole of the Bailey” McKern (!), viciously tried to take Ringo’s famed ring finger, in “Help!”

With four commentaries – three of them featuring Hammer standby screenwriter Jimmy Sangster — this is a must for those obsessed with the famed studio’s history, but definitely optional for others. (Only one commentary, “Terror of the Tongs” is all that engaging, even by film geek standards.) Still, there are worse ways to while away a series of weekend afternoon. For all their flaws, these movies are far more noble time-wasters than most of today’s multiplex potboilers.

Click to buy “Icons of Adventure”

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑