Category: TV (Page 415 of 595)

TCA Press Tour: You’re up, “Chuck.”

I don’t know why NBC is so insistent about calling its new show, “Chuck,” a drama. It’s not a drama. It might have hints of drama; ultimately, though, it’s an action-comedy…with considerable emphasis on the comedy, thanks to the tag-team efforts of Zachary Levi and Joshua Gomez. You might know Levi from his work on the ABC comedy, “Less than Perfect”…but, then again, as Levi himself admits, you may not. (When referencing the show during the panel, he began by saying, “For anybody who watched ‘Less Than Perfect’…so, what, probably 5 or 10 of you…?”) Gomez, however, comes off stints on “Invasion” and “Without A Trace,” but even without a solid comedic background, he nonetheless comes across a lot like Seth Green on coke. (That’s a good thing…or, at least, I think it is, anyway.)

In the long run, though, most people will be interested in “Chuck” because it’s the handiwork of Josh Schwartz, late of “The O.C..” Certainly, that was the case with several of the reporters in attendance, one of whom brought up the fact that Chuck works in a Best-Buy-like store, then asked, “Is the store big enough that it will one day have a stage on which indie bands can perform?”

“Absolutely,” said Schwartz, with a grin. “In-store promotion, we’ll get it done.”

Going on, however, Schwartz made it clear what appealed to him about “Chuck.” “After ‘The O.C.,’ I was definitely looking to do something that would have more of a genre element to it, but still be able to do it in the style in which I like to write and the kind of characters that I very much enjoy. And Chris (Fedak, co-producer) and I, we went to film school together. We sat down, and he had the initial concept for the show, which I thought was really interesting and could also
be really funny and would give us really the spine we needed to tell this story and to do it in a way that could speak to the ‘quarter-life’ crisis that our character of Chuck is undergoing and also be able to do it with a lot of humor as well.”

Speaking of humor, it’s clear that Levi learned quite a few comedic chops while on “Less Than Perfect,” whether anyone was watching it or not. When asked if he considered himself to be smart (if not necessarily as smart as his character), Levi responded, “He went to Stanford and is this crazy brain of a guy and can figure out algorithms. I can’t even spell
‘algorithm.’ I always have the excuse that I would’ve gone to college if I had applied myself. So, no, I’m not as smart as Chuck…but I like to think I’m decent, right? Maybe? I hope!”

Executive producer McG (he was behind the “Charlie’s Angels” movies, you know) went on to acknowledge that “Chuck” owes a certain debt to the work of William Gibson…if not necessarily the film version of “Johnny Mnemonic.” “It’s called a seminal performance of Keanu Reeves,” McG said, with a laugh, before explaining that he’s had a long association with that film’s AD staff, who used to tell horror stories about the difficulty of the shoot.

As the panel wrapped up, Schwartz was asked if there was anything he might’ve learned from his experiences on “The O.C.” that he would make a point of not repeating on “Chuck.”

“What are you implying?” he snapped. Then, after offering a smile, he admitted that he’d learned quite a lot during his time on the show. “‘The “O.C.’ was my first experience doing anything that was, you know, out there. It was a great experience, but it was also a tremendous learning experience. So there’s a lot of things that I will take from that and apply here.

“I think most of all, it’s staying focused on the work itself and not trying to worry about all the other things. We have a great group of people that we’re doing the show with. I’m really fortunate to work with Chris and McG and we’re having a blast making this show, and that’s the thing I just real wanted to be able to stay focused on.”

TCA Press Tour: You know who needs his own talk show? The head of security from “The Jerry Springer Show.”

Okay, maybe Steve Wilkos doesn’t need his own show. But despite the inevitable skepticism that will result from viewers who cannot and will not disassociate Wilkos from his former employer, the brief look we got at “The Steve Wilkos Show” found a show much more rooted in the territory of folks like Montel Williams or Maury Povich. (Okay, maybe I should specify “early Maury Povich”; that guy’s practically another Springer these days.) Wilkos, a former Marine and a longtime veteran of the Chicago Police Department, doesn’t appear to be going for sensationalism; he seriously comes across as a guy who just wants to use his public forum to help people, and it’s hard not to root for someone with such a goal.

Mind you, it was a little disconcerting that the panel seemed to be led much more by the show’s executive producer, Richard Dominick, than by Wilkos himself. Once in awhile, though, Wilkos managed to get a word in edgewise…and, perhaps inevitably, much of that time was spent defining the considerable differences between himself and the show he’s just left.

“There are no similarities,” stated Wilkos, definitively. “You know, ‘The Jerry Springer Show’ was a crazy circus and, believe me, I’m going to miss working on that show because for 14 years…you know, I never considered it work. I went, and I had a great time, and I had fun with the guys. It was a lot of fun. But this is…when you are a policeman, you have to take it more seriously. And this show is dealing with people that are coming to me, calling the show, and asking for help. And we are going to try to help these people.”

But surely people will look at you and say, “Hey, it’s that dude from ‘The Jerry Springer Show,'” yes…?

“Hey, you know what? People are going to say that,” admits Wilkos. “People are going to do that. But (once) they tune in and they start watching my show, then they’ll get it. And some people have gotten it. They’ve seen, when I hosted ‘The Jerry Springer Show,’ especially the last 20 or 30 that I hosted, we didn’t do the typical Springer show. Like, we did this show on a guy where he was abusing his wife, the girl living with the guy in the van. And there was actually a really great
response, where people were like, ‘Wow, can you help me?’ So I think doing the show going forward, when people are always going to associate with me with Springer, which is fine with me, because I love Jerry and I loved working on his show. But my show is not ‘The Jerry Springer Show.’ It’s going to be completely different.”

TCA Press Tour: I am so totally pro-“Bionic Woman”

I know, you’re skeptical. You’re thinking, “It’s the freaking Bionic Woman! How good can it be?” It can be very good, my friend. It’s a dark re-invention of the franchise, and – like “Battlestar: Galactica,” it’s a re-invention so dramatic that, if my hazy memory of the original series serves me well, the only thing that’s made the transition from old series to new is the name of the lead character: Jamie Sommers, played by British actress Michelle Ryan. (Ryan also appears in BBC America’s new series, “Jekyll,” as it happens.)

Of course, this begs the question, “Why bother to re-make the series at all? Why not just create a brand new series that’s about a woman who gets bionic parts?” Accusations of the producers just trying to cash in on the vague recollections of children of the ’70s have been flying, but they swear that’s not the case. Then again, though, they don’t really do much to dispel the concept, either.

I’m sure the panel saw it coming that the reporters would eventually start throwing questions at them about Isaiah Washington’s upcoming stint on the show; if so, they weren’t disappointed. First, however, they had to get past the concerns that there was some ominous reason for Katee Sackhoff’s absence from the panel, possibly connected to the fact that doesn’t actually have a deal set yet. Smilovic calmed them down pretty quickly on that front, though, by stating matter-of-factly that “Katee is on the show. I’m not going to go into the specific natures of the deals. She’s on the show, and she’s not here today because of a scheduling conflict; that’s the only reason she’s not here today.”

The second half of the conference, however, was almost entirely dedicated to queries about Washington’s appearance and how much re-writing of the role – which existed before it was ever pitched to him – was required to fit him into it (the only change is that the character was originally sketched out to be around for an indefinite period of time; now, he has a definitive exit) and if casting Washington is an insult to the gay community. (Said producer Jason Smilovic, “Absolutely not. We embrace the gay community, we are hoping that they are going to watch the show, and we are in no way making any judgments or statements or assignations about what was said or what was done.”)

Is Isaiah Washington really worth all this discussion? I think the situation is abundantly clear: the guy’s great in front of the camera, but, when he’s off-camera, he’s got a nasty case of foot-in-mouth disease. So just get him to shut the hell up and stick to acting.

Anyway, Washington or no Washington, “Bionic Woman” looks awesome to me. It’s dark, it’s action-packed, and it has Miguel Ferrer in it. (Albert Rosenfeld rules!)

My only concern is that it was revealed that Jamie’s sister is being completely retooled from what we saw in the pilot; once, she was deaf, but now she’s not. She’s also now got a background in computer hacking. On the whole, I think the deaf angle was far more interesting. Plus, count on a lot of really annoyed deaf people wanting to know why the character was changed…

TCA Press Tour: They call him…Tin Man.

The idea of updating L. Frank Baum’s classic “The Wizard of Oz” isn’t exactly a new one. Since the hard-to-top version with Judy Garland, Ray Bolger, Jack Haley, Bert Lahr…oh, hell, you know who’s in it. Anyway, point being, there have been several attempts at re-doing it, but most of them have fallen flat. I will say that “Tin Man,” Sci-Fi’s take on the story, has a few elements that make me cringe – Dorothy Gale (Zooey Deschanel) is referred to as D.G., and the land of Oz is constantly referred to as “the O.Z.” (ugh!) – but, damn, it sure looks awesome…and the fact that the cast includes the aforementioned Ms. Deschanel as well as Alan Cumming, Richard Dreyfuss, and others doesn’t hurt any, either.

(Don’t bother looking for Cumming and Dreyfuss; the latter apparently had a scheduling conflict, and the former, while represented, actually appeared via video, in a satellite link-up.)

The writers of “Tin Man,” Craig Van Sickle and Steven Long Mitchell, tried to deflect the references to the musical “Wicked” that several reporters wanted to throw at them, but they seemed legitimately enthusiastic about their script.

“For us, it was a labor of love,” said Van Sickle, “because the books were such a big part of our childhood. When SCI FI said, ‘Go, give it a shot, and let your imaginations run wild,’ we did, and it was just — I mean, it was just a labor of love. I mean, it was something we have always dreamed of doing.” Added Mitchell, “Since the book itself is such a classic, it allows itself to be re-interpreted or re-invented, and I think that we knew when we were attempting this that we were going to be compared to the original book and any other interpretations, but our feeling was the source material was so strong, the iconic nature of all those characters were so strong that we could bring it to a whole new generation in a new way, hopefully.”

There’s definitely been a considerable amount of re-envisioning of characters. In this case, the Tin Man is completely human; he’s so called because he’s a policeman…with a tin badge. Says Neal McDonough, who plays the character, “He was a sheriff in the outer zone, and I was then captured and put into this pod for eight years and watched my wife and son be murdered in front of me through this hologram for eight years. And that was the torture that I was put through. And then I come out of it, and I’m going to seek revenge. My character in particular — well, all of us, actually. We’re all very, very human…and very real.”

Yeah, but how will it work with such a dramatic re-imagination? Time will tell. (It doesn’t air ’til Decemember.)

Let’s close with the best throwaway line from the conference: one of the reporters asked Deschanel if there were any similarities between D.G. and her next role, Janis Joplin, and while Deschanel couldn’t imagine there were any, her co-star Raoul Trujillo quipped, “They’re both looking for the poppy fields.”

TCA Press Tour: James Woods is my new motherf***ing hero

I’ll tackle the “Shark” panel in greater detail later, but I had to share these two moments of James-Woods-ian brilliance with you:

1) When one of the reporters bemoaned the panel – Woods, his co-star Jeri Ryan, and producer / creator Ian Biederman – for not giving them anything that made for good copy, Woods stepped up to bat. “Okay, well, I honestly hate these mother fuckers, but I’m getting paid so, you know, what am I going to do. That fucking Jeri Ryan bitch. She shows up in a fucking Borg suit and says, “Hey, remember me when I was hot?” One more fucking time and I’m done!” At this point, he finally gave in to laughter, saying, “Okay, I think we’re done now.”

2) In the last moments of the panel, Woods tackled the issue of his character’s questionable moral decision in the season finale, when he knowingly sent a man to prison for a crime he didn’t commit because he knew that he that he was guilty of other crimes. As it happens, Woods didn’t really agree with Biederman’s decision to have Sebastian Stark do what he did. “I don’t believe in vigilante justice,” he said…then, after a moment, added, “Except if I were pissed off about something. Then I would believe in it. I mean, you know, I get lousy customer support, I want to get involved in a workplace killing.”

At this point, Woods began to mime speaking into a phone. “‘Where in India are you, mother fucker? Where exactly in Sumatra are you, you fucker?'”

A beat.

“Oh, boy, that wasn’t politically correct,” said Woods. “I wouldn’t want to see that get out.”

Right. That would explain why he then proceeded to make the international hand signal for jacking off…and also why tried to give the publicists at CBS a heart attack with his next words:

“Hey, Isaiah Washington’s back. So that’s good.” With a wicked grin, Woods continued. “Let’s have some controversy. I’m so tempted. I’m so tempted to say it, but I’m not…”

The reporters, of course, were egging him on, even as Biederman was nervously suggesting, “Let’s wait ’til Season 4, can we?”

In the end, Woods demurred. “I’m sure we could do it and kid around and have a good time,” he said, “but, no, somebody would take it the wrong way. All the CBS people back there, they’re shitting themselves right now.”

And with that, “Shark” publicist Barbara Abseck got the biggest laugh of the panel: “Sooooooo…this concludes our session.”

Yeah, but what a way to go…

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑