Category: Movies (Page 497 of 498)

Weekend wizards will put a spell on box office slump

The Harry Potter movies are one of the most successful franchises in the history of film, so it’s no surprise that the fourth installment of the series (“Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire“) is the main attraction this weekend in theaters. And out of all of the chapters thus far, I must say that this is the best looking Potter of the bunch, and one that I’m actually excited to see. Meanwhile, the other major release of the week is the Johnny Cash biopic “Walk the Line,” and while it may not bring in as much business as the adolescent wizard, it will certainly make a good lump of cash. The film probably won’t win Best Picture or Best Director honors at next year’s Academy Awards, but if it doesn’t sweep the Best Actor/Actress category, I’d be stunned. Joaquin Phoenix is shoe-in for the award (I don’t even need to see anything else to determine this) and Reese Witherspoon has a pretty good shot considering everything else that’s been released. If nothing else, this a movie you should see strictly for these two performances.

Saw 2” and “Chicken Little” are still tearing up the box office, and if you haven’t seen them yet, then maybe you should.

“Saw” is for suckers

Seen the trailer for “Hostel,” the Eli Roth movie that’s coming out next year? Sweet Jesus. Just when we thought that the makers of the “Saw” movies were the sickest people alive, along comes this happy little tale about a group of backpackers who head to this Slovakian hostel because they heard that they can live out their deepest darkest desires. And while that may be true, they have no idea exactly what it entails.

The trailer doesn’t actually show much, except for the tip of a toe in the vice of a very large wrench. And, unlike the “Saw” movies, where the victims of Jigsaw’s games are forced to commit unspeakable acts on themselves, the trailer for “Hostel” suggests that the hapless victims are tortured by someone else, someone who paid for the privilege. The worst part of this premise is that it is allegedly based on true events, though finding documentation of said events is rather difficult.

The success of the “Saw” movies is a great story from a less-is-more perspective, but it’s also a rather disturbing observation of what as a people turns us on. On the plus side, it could mean the end of the snuff film industry, since these movies have rendered them obsolete.

Munson’s Top 5 Worst Movies Ever

If you’re not a pal o’ mine over at MySpace, then you didn’t see this little piece I originally posted over there. Anyway, this seems like the more fitting joint to lay it down, so I give to you, dear readers, my very own top five list of my least favorite movies of all time. Feel free to disagree, though I can’t see why you’d want to. (Note: I’ve changed my original 5th place flick.)

5. “Eraserhead”. I used to think David Lynch was super-cool back in my high school days (i.e., 14+ years ago). I enjoyed “Blue Velvet” and even “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me”, and a couple others. But not even in my biggest fanboy days did I ever enjoy “Eraserhead”. It’s one of those cult movies that doesn’t deserve its cult. Actually, I can’t even stand Lynch anymore, save for the original “Twin Peaks” TV series. When you’re in high school, weird for weird’s sake is pretty cool at times, but once you get older and grumpier, you get tired of watching abstract wanking. “Lost Highway” was a wretched piece of poo, and “Mulholland Drive” wasn’t far behind. Let’s face it: there have been much better and weirder flicks in either commercial or indie styles to have come along and completely blown Lynch out of his own water, so I just say, “Please, Dave, no more nuttiness. Do a romantic comedy with Fran Drescher.”

4. “The Majestic”. In which Jim Carrey punishes us all for liking his funny movies by agreeing to star in a completely life-draining piece of sap. Why is that comedic actors always go through a “I’m a serious actor!” phase? I’ll give props to Jimbo for his work in “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”, but he almost lost me completely after this disaster. It was even sadder to see his character in “Bruce Almighty” unironically bitch about wanting to be taken seriously. That’s the kind of second-grade pandering that people should just immediately throw popcorn and flat soda at. Dammit, I still think the second “Ace Ventura” movie is funny, as well as “The Cable Guy”. There’s no excuse for “The Majestic”, though, just like there’s no excuse for Adam Sandler to still be making movies after his first two.

3. “The Blair Witch Project”. The biggest ripoff of all time if you went into this thinking it was real. I hadn’t, having read an article about it a month before its premiere in Rolling Stone. What sounded really interesting on paper turned out to be one of the dullest, uninspired pieces of celluloid that for some reason still gets praised for its originality and “scares.” Whatever. There aren’t any scares, period. The folks who say it’s what you can’t see that’s scary are just pussies when it comes to gore and traditional scary flicks. Dammit, “Seven” was a scary movie, and that was a crime thriller, for God’s sake! So don’t gimme any reasons why this was scary. Especially when the dialogue is nothing but a bunch of “fuck you”s strung together, as well as people bitching about maps, cigarettes, and most importantly, getting that equipment back to the school! I’m just glad these heather, Josh, and Mike all got killed in the end. I was glad they wouldn’t be wasting my time anymore with their hysterics. The audience I was in laughed during the movie and booed the screen when it was all over, and rightfully so. As for the sequel, I actually preferred it. Evryone else hated it, natch, because it was just a regular ol’ horror flick. But I’ll take boobies and blood any day over dough faced Heather and hippie Josh. Word is Sanchez and Myrick are working up the Bore Witch prequel (they had nothing to do with “Book of Shadows”). Too late, guys. Everyone’s moved on.

2. “The Ghosts of Edendale”. I’ll bet you haven’t even ever heard of this disaster. Lucky you if you haven’t. This is Stefan Avalos’ followup to his successful, funny, and downright creepy “The Last Broadcast”, which came out before “The Blair Witch Project” and saw many of its core elements “borrowed” for the latter. Avalos likes to work within the digital genre of filmmaking, which basically means he spends a lot of his own dough making flicks on his desktop computer. This worked magnificently for “The Last Broadcast”‘s documentary-type feel, but for “The Ghosts of Edendale”, it just makes it feel like a porn flick. There’s even a semi sex scene here that’s well worth passing over. The dialogue is crap, the acting and actors are completely wooden, and the “effects” are hilariously bad. Think of it as the visual equivalent of an old Casio keyboard. Somehow, Warner Brothers decided to distribute this movie on DVD. Trust me, you won’t even make it past 30 minutes of this snorefest. The funniest thing on the DVD is Avalos’ commentary, in which he pats himself on the back for staring a scene with a shot of the back of main community center actor Stephen Wastell. Ooh yeah, Stefan, that is amazing indeed. Zzzzz.

1. “Last Days”. The fine folks at Bullz-Eye itself gave this a really bad review, so I just had to see for myself. I would have given this crapper no stars had I reviewed it. Gus Van Sant takes us on a mind numbing voyage with “Blake,” the Bizarro World version of Kurt Cobain, since he couldn’t secure the rights to Cobain’s own story. But you’ll see Blake walk around stones on smack, mumbling while other characters flit around doing nothing. Van Sant tortures us not only with this but also with long drawn out scenes that go nowhere. Case in point, when Blake first cranks up his guitar and lays down a multi-tracked tune on his own. It must go on for five minutes, all the while the camera slowly pulls back farther and farther from Blake’s house. Ugh. I never again want to hear how The Beatles’ “Magical Mystery Tour” is boring and how nothing happens in it. At least you had The Beatles goofing off in that. This has literally nothing, and why anyone associated with it wanted to be associated with it is beyond me. Poor Asia Argento.

Hollywood’s undies in bundle over product placement

The Writer’s Guild of America is seeking a new “code of conduct” to govern product placement deals in television and film, the Associated Press reported yesterday. It would be an excellent example of consumer protection…if the true motives of those involved weren’t so transparent.

The WGA (along with key members of the Screen Actors Guild) claims to want full disclosure of all paid product placements at the beginning of each program or movie, so that viewers will be aware of any “hidden or stealth” advertising contained therein. Sounds great, yes? How thoughtful of them to look out for the poor clueless consumer, right?

Wrong. Like everything in Hollywood, this is about money, and nothing more. The WGA is tired of watching Mark Burnett wallpaper his mansions with C-notes while their entire membership lives in a brown paper bag in a septic tank. Burnett–and the reality empire he spawned–has been milking the product-placement cash cow for years, and Hollywood’s writers and actors want their share of the cream.

There’s one problem with that line of thought, though: Product placement is advertising. Does the writing staff for “ER” get a percentage of every $500,000, thirty-second spot sold in that show? No. So why do reality writers think they’re special?

Yes, the terms of product placement deals are different from standard advertising buys, and yes, writing for a reality show is different from writing for a scripted comedy or drama. So what? Writers for both types of shows are still getting paid–and paid obscenely well, by most people’s standards. Editing footage around this week’s “Apprentice” product plug is part of the job, just like writing Jennifer Garner’s pregnancy into the “Alias” storyline is just another (deplorable) part of that job.

The WGA also needs to give people a little more credit. If my neighbor down the street buys a Ford F-150 truck because Jack Bauer drives one on “24”, then my neighbor’s an idiot, and he deserves what he gets: an ugly truck, and a dent in his bank account. Caveat emptor, buddy.

More importantly, WGA needs to be careful what they wish for. Right now, whether the writers realize it or not, product-placement revenue is helping to keep them employed, by making these shows financially viable. With network TV ratings in steady decline, and advertisers frustrated by consumers’ increasing tendency to skip through standard commercials, product placement fills a growing revenue gap.

The writers and actors can whine all they want about how unfair it is for Mark Burnett to make so much money, or how they hate it when a product plug is shoehorned into their scripts, or how reality writers deserve to be paid more than they are. Those are separate issues. They can be addressed without rattling the FCC’s cage–and without undermining what is currently Hollywood’s most effective solution to declining TV and movie viewership.

So listen up, spoiled writers and actors: You might not like the cash cow. You might think it’s ugly, and awkward, and an affront to your artistic sensibilities. It probably is.

But the milk that cow produces is paying for your house, and your car, and your personal assistant, whether you realize it or not. And if you kill the cow, you might get a nice steak dinner out of the deal…but then it will be gone.

Box Office Recap, November 11-13

The numbers are based on Sunday estimates.

1) Chicken Little – $32 million, $80.8 million in two weeks.
This certainly has to make Disney feel a little better about their position in their ongoing negotiations with Pixar for the right to stamp a pair of mouse ears on Pixar’s golden eggs. Translation: Disney’s still over the barrel, but now Pixar isn’t forcing them to keep that rubber ball in their mouth.

2) Zathura – $14 million, first week
Coming soon to the Chinese Theatre: get your photograph taken with a broke, smelly guy in a Zorgon costume.

3) Derailed – $12.8 million, first week
Given the fact that Weinstein Co. played three card monte with this movie in order to keep us from seeing it, the fact that it made eight figures must be considered a victory for all concerned.

4) Get Rich or Die Tryin’ – $12.5 million, first week (Wednesday opening)
Much ado was made about a man who was shot and killed at the concession stand of a Pittsburgh theater that was showing this movie, but all we have to say is, we were out of town when that shit happened.

5) Jarhead – $12.2 million, $47 million in two weeks
The amount of screen time Chris Cooper has in the movie is only slightly more time than he spends onscreen in the trailer.

Not Everyone in Hollywood is Hemorrhaging Money Dept.: Saw II – $9.4 million, $74.1 million in three weeks, which is 15 times more than the movie cost to make. The Legend of Zorro, meanwhile, has grossed $39.5 million in three weeks, which is slightly less than half its estimated budget of $80 million. Coming from Sony next fall: Bear Trap, starring Paul Walker.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑