Category: Movie Dramas (Page 177 of 188)

Multiplex Mayhem, Pre-Game Edition

It’s the second week of this little experiment in Thursday evening/Friday morning film quarterbacking. And there’s no time to be wasted….Or maybe there is. That’s because, whatever else may be true, with the possible exception of one exciting experiment in larger than life rock and roll and an art-house experiment with children’s attention spans, this weekend does not look to be anything for the history books.


*Generally speaking, “Leatherheads” is the kind of mainstream flick I root for. A romantic comedy hearkening to the thirties and forties screwball era when, weird as it might sound to younger folks, examples of the genre were quite frequently watchable or better, because they bothered to employ devices like characters and stories. These days we expect that sort of thing only from Judd Apatow and sometimes Jane Austen. In this case, of course, you add a little football history for some male appeal and a top-draw cast featuring A-listers George Clooney (who also directs) and Renee Zellweger, A-list farm team draft pick John Krasinski of “The Office”, outstanding character actors Jonathan Pryce and Stephen Root (who, when he dies, will no doubt see his grave adorned with a certain crimsom office product) and you might think you could wind up with some superior entertainment, if not necessarily box-office gold.

On the other hand, Clooney’s attempt at true screwball has received mediocre reviews — surprising considering that the third-time director is something of a critical darling, given his last film was “Good Night and Good Luck,” but then neither that film nor Clooney’s directing debut, “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind” showed anything like a light touch, and he’s playing in a field where giants like Howard Hawks, Ernst Lubitsch, Preston Sturges, and lots of other dead guys you’ve never heard of once roamed. Still, given the star power and the simple date-movie compromise premise, this one seems destined to do reasonable to good business. Variety thinks it’ll be #1. Not proof, of course, but to quote history’s most famous sportswriter, Damon Runyon: “The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that’s the way to bet.”


*Still, it’s just a gut-call that “Nim’s Island“, not exactly beloved by our own David Medsker, won’t win this weekend and, if nothing else, it has the most screens. A lame-sounding premise about a “magical island ruled by a young girl’s imagination” doesn’t bode well, nor does the low-key promotion (of course, I’m not a parent and I have a DVR — any Nickelodeon-prisoners out there tired of commercials for this one?). What’s weird is that this one is headlined by Jodie Foster, Gerard “300” Butler, and “Little Miss Sunshine” herself, Abigail Breslin — I mean how’s that for uniting three disparate audience groupings? And, of course, it’s a family film and as such should never be discounted if adults can pleasurably sit through it. An open question (well, not to Dave!) and all I’ve got to go with otherwise is a 49% Tomatometer rating, but I’m going to guess “not so much” is the answer.

* And, who knows, it’s in more theaters than “Leatherheads” and this week’s entry in the unscreened for critics horror sweeptakes, “The Ruins” could pull an upset…but I doubt it. It feels as if I’ve been suffering through the trailers since the Carter Administration. And my hunch is this film from nature photographer-turned-first-time-director Carter Smith and author/screenwriter Scott B. Smith (the Smith Brothers?) didn’t look anything other than oddly disgusting — yet also sort of dull. The often easy-to-please Box Office Mojo readers seem none too excited about this one and the vibe is getting is that it’s probably too soft for today’s masochistic young fans of extreme horror, while, at least as per its promotion, it’s too harsh and uninviting for everyone else. The one interesting wrinkle — Scott Smith is the ultra-lauded writer of both the screenplay and original novel behind 1998’s outstanding “A Simple Plan.” Maybe it’s not quite as bad as looks, but maybe it’s worse.

*That’s pretty much it for the week’s major release — unless you count the 273 largely IMAX screen release “Shine a Light,” Martin Scorsese’s first concert film since 1978’s near-perfect “The Last Waltz,” starring none other The Rolling Stones, still freaky — actually freakier — after all these years. The critics dig it. Bill Clinton apparently digs it, and shows up onscreen, and Hillary has praised the Stones recently, but no word yet on whether she remembers nearly being stabbed by Hell’s Angels at Altamont. But seriously, this is the release I’m most looking forward to checking out this week, even if the answer to the big question asked in a million dorm rooms is, of course, “The Beatles.”


Meanwhile, in Indiewood….
The big news in the Cinephile crowd this week is the appearance of two Asian princes of contemplative cinema, aka “boring art films,” working in the west. The more promising of two is also an interesting stretch, unpronounceable cineaste fave Hou Hsiao-hsien takes a stab at a Parisian child’s classic with “The Flight of the Red Balloon” and has the gang at Greencine chattering away. And how’s this for a quote:

“A remarkably rich, rewarding, and restful experience, Hou’s latest is a film like no other – in the simplicity of its lines, colors, and framing, and in the complexity of how those elements compound and contextualize its emotional subject matter, The Flight of the Red Balloon can, in my mind, be compared to the works of Matisse.”

Bring the kids! Bring sedatives! But seriously folks, I’ve missed Hsia-hsien’s other films, but this one appears to be a pretty intriguing take on the classic 1956 French short, “The Red Balloon,” that was frequently trotted out on 16mm at my elementary school. Also it’s got Juliette Binoche — and you never know what’s going to grab the little ones. If you want real contemplative cinema for kids, try watching an old episode of “Thunderbird” sometime.

And Sophia Coppola’s favorite Hong Kong slow-mo romantic, Wong Kar Wai, makes his American debut and gets a mixed response with “My Blueberry Nights.” Personally, I haven’t been a big fan of even for the HK maverick’s most lauded films, “In the Mood for Love” or “Chungking Express” but he does know how to craft some truly stunning imagery, and with cast that includes Rachel Weisz, Natalie Portman, and, making her film debut in the lead role, singing/piano playing sensation Norah Jones, there’s be plenty to look at, with Jude Law on hand for the ladies and David Strathairn challenging the Kar Wai aesthetic with his good-acting nonbeauty.

Also opening this week in limited release is a highly praised Israeli film anthology film, “Jellyfish” and the poorly received, and poorly titled black comedy from Daniel Waters (“Heathers”) “Sex and Death 101“. The film stars Winona Ryder, who I always appreciate (really), and Simon Baker — who I’m glad as on hand because his presence, and the release of the Scorsese-directed “Shine a Light” gives me the excuse to close with this mini-classic, which made the rounds last fall…The greatest ever Alfred Hithcock tribute that’s also a mockumentary, and a sparkling wine commercial. Directed by M. Scorsese and starring Marty and Baker.

Multiplex Mayhem, the Sunday Night Post-Mortem

Shockingly, terrifyingly, it turns out that most of my predictions in the Friday post turned out to be correct.

*”21” earned a respectable $23.7 million for the film’s budget ($35 million), winning the weekend though not doing much to reverse the modest box-office trend right now. As for theories about why it won, here’s a quote from Variety

Sony prexy of domestic distribution Rory Bruer credited a great cast, a compelling story and out-of-the-box marketing for the film’s perf.

“People knew they were in for a fun ride. The film brought to life a world you really felt you were a part of. We got a great mix, from older adults to younger adults, to males and to females,” Bruer said. “It was cool, fresh and different.”

Yes, “cool, fresh and different.” It’s not just a movie, it’s a salad dressing. (I also gotta say, I know some folks hate the Variety lingo, but I get a kick out of the word “prexy” for “president.” It sounds so non-threatening and sort of like a Keebler elf. On the other hand, I don’t think I’d want to entrust thermonuclear launch codes to a “prexy.”)

*Not one bit to my surprise, “Horton Hears a Who” stayed strong at #2 with a reasonably elephantine $17,425.00 as per the mighty Weekend Mojo. I’m a firm believer in the “nobody knows anything” school of looking at show business; there is nothing in this world harder to gauge than human irrationality. However, the one formula that seems genuinely unbreakable is that a family film that kids like and parents find even mildly entertaining is as close as the universe gets to a license to print money.

*I doubt the Mighty Fanboy boycott can truly take credit for it (though I can’t blame them for claiming it), but as predicted/wished, “Superhero Movie” came up with a fairly lousy third place showing for this kind of movie of $9,510,000 on 2,960 screens (more than 300 more screens than “21” opened on), despite the demonstration-disbanding efforts of the non-galactic storm troopers of mall security. “Just like Beggar’s Canyon back home”? Well, we take our triumphs where we find them, even if, to be fair, there’s some indication “Superhero Movie” might be at least a tiny bit better than other recent spoof films, as Cinematical’s Eugene Novikov schools us on the gradations.

*Of the other new movies this weekend, I’m not all that happy to report that Kimberley Peirce’s “Stop-Loss” did the predicted mediocre-to-terrible business, given that while it had a few fans among critics, its reviews and overall buzz were nowhere near strong enough to give it half a chance with such tough subject matter. Always sad to see the movie that at least tries get nailed.

Nevertheless, while its earnings of $4,525,000 were dismal, the per-screen average of “Stop-Loss” was $3,505 — actually nearly $300 bucks higher than “Superhero Movie,” so there’s that. Even, so, audiences bear the ignominy of being slightly more kind to both “Shutter” and “10,000 B.C.“, proud owners of 7 and 9 percent ratings on the RT meter. (Of the former, a PG-13 remake of a Thai horror film — points for originality since it wasn’t Japanese or Korean — Bullz-Eye’s own Jeff Giles wrote: “This will not be a theatrical hit. It will not find a new audience on DVD. You can officially pretend it was never made.”)

*Meanwhile, good ol’ Simon Pegg has had his cult status confirmed in the harshest way possible with the drubbing of his David Schwimmer-directed “Run, Fatboy, Run” which netted only $2,390,000 and had the lowest per-screen average of any new film this week. On the plus side, it also had the lowest budget, a mere $10 million, so there’s something to be said for thrift.

Meanwhile in Indiewood…. And, here too, yours truly seems to have called it. The immigration weepie, “Under the Same Moon” came in just below “Run, Fatboy, Run” with $2,251,000 — but did so while being in only 390 theaters (“Fatboy” was on over 1,100 screens, far too many for a modest comedy.) Its growth seems strong and this one could be headed for something like “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” territory, driven, no doubt, by the eternally under-served Latino audience.

The only film I was sort of wrong about was that the highest per screen average of any film this week was “My Brother is an Only Child,” an interesting sounding, politically driven Italian film with great reviews, about which I made a crack implying I’d be the only person reading this column who would consider seeing the movie, nevertheless managed a whopping $10,500 per screen average. Of course, it’s only on one screen in NYC, but still….

And, finally, I was appalled to realize only too late that I had not mentioned the opening in limited release of the boxing-themed Adam Carolla vehicle, “The Hammer” because it wasn’t mentioned, well, anywhere, but last week’s “Ebert and Roeper” and perhaps some L.A. area local media, and so it had completely slipped my mind.

Now, some of you will be hooting in derision because you think of Adam as the slightly less unfunny guy on the early seasons of “The Man Show” and others will be perking up because he’s the even funnier guy on the early seasons of “The Man Show,” but radio fans, especially out here in SoCal, know Adam as the host of the only-ever listenable iteration of “Love Line,” and something of an actual comedy genius in terms of mastering the art of the impromptu rant about idiots who try to argue that they cheated on their signifant other’s “on accident,” or garbage collectors who refuse to pick up certain types of garbage. After he left “Loveline,” I feared that he’d never find a format as amenable to his particular skills. Certainly a well-reviewed movie was about the last place I expected to find him. However, in perhaps the most shocking development in filmed entertainment history, critics seem to like this movie, more or less, netting a very healthy 72% Fresh rating on the Tomato Meter.

But here’s the really strange part — even though it entirely failed to even register at Box Office Mojo, according to RT, “The Hammer,” which also got “two thumbs up” from Richard Roeper and Michael Phillips, did a very respectable per screen average of $4,857 for a total of approximately $97,000+ at twenty theaters. Not bad for a movie even confirmed movie-geeks aren’t hearing about just yet.

Could “The Hammer” wind up doing better than “Run, Fatboy, Run,” with a similar sports/rom-com set-up, but with possibly far better, old fashioned slow-roll-out release pattern? Weirder things have happened.

Multiplex Mayhem, the Friday Report

Okay, so this is the start of a new, ongoing feature we’re going to be trying here at Premium Hollywood in which I’ll be taking a look at the slate of new movies releases for the coming weekend each Friday, making highly opinionated remarks about them, and perhaps engaging in some box-office prognostication — though I’ll mostly avoid specific numbers as I am certain to be wrong. Then, on Sunday night/Monday morning, I’ll be reporting back with information on just how very wrong I was, with further apt comments on same.

Let the madness begin….

* 21seeks to draw on the the commercialized glamor of Las Vegas and the age old impossible dream of beating the house. As per the Hollywood Reporter, Sony is expecting the film to win the weekend and perhaps earn as much as a cool $20 million for the relatively low-budget film. It’s likely they’re not wrong, I’m afraid, though, even in its third weekend, the family appeal of “Horton Hears a Who” may be somewhat hard to beat with a film that really doesn’t seem to be exciting anyone all that much. It certainly didn’t wow Bullz-Eye’s own Jason Zingale, nor the Rotten Tomatoes gang, where the consensus seems to be that “Legally Blonde” director Robert Luketic and screenwriters Peter Steinfeld and Allan Loeb have done the usual Hollywood thing with a fact based film, and left out all the interesting parts of the story described in Ben Mezrich’s bestseller, Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six M.I.T. Students Who Took Vegas for Millions. Also, with a cast led by Jim Sturgess (“Across the Universe“), and Kate “Lois Lane” Bosworth, it’s depending an awful lot on the star power of Kevin “Lex Luthor” Spacey as well as another give-away-the-whole-story trailer that so irritated The New Republic‘s Christopher Orr, he dispensed with seeing the film and reviewed the trailer instead.

(Bret Michel of The Phoenix has a semi-spoilerific rundown on the changes from book/mostly-true story to film, which includes de-Asian Americanizing the real-life main character of the book, Jeff Ma. Ma, presumably well paid, doesn’t seem to have a problem with this, and there is a token Asian in the filmic group of unusually attractive overachieving nerds turned card counters, but I count this is as a cop-out and a missed opportunity. Hollywood really seems to have an issue with Asian-American men not practiced in the martial arts, and, in world where John Cho exists, there really isn’t that much an excuse other than rank cowardice. Besides, there’s more to life than playing Harold and Sulu.)*

* If “21” is the main commercial hope of this weekend, then the Iraq war drama, Stop-Lossis the leader of this week’s quality derby. Not only is it a look at the effect of extended warfare on young soldiers fighting the war in Iraq, it’s the first film since 1999 from writer-director Kimberly Peirce, whose stunning gender-bending debut, “Boys Don’t Cry” seemed to announce her as a major directing talent — though her only directing credit since has been a single episode of “The L Word.”

“Stop-Loss” predictably fared better on the Tomatometer than “21” — but not all that much better. That’s bad news, because “serious issue” films generally need at least borderline ecstatic reviews to succeed, not half-hearted appreciations of good intentions. Though it has a moderately big name in the stolid Ryan Phillippe and the always outstanding Joseph Gordon-Levitt in a supporting role, I would be flabbergasted if this one did anything but mediocre-to-abysmal business. In any case, if ever a war seemed to be box-office poison, it’s this one. W didn’t only screw several nations with his war, he had to include filmmakers as well

* Not screened for critics, I think it’s safe to say that “Superhero Movie” isn’t going for quality. Especially lately, Hollywood has rarely lost money underestimating the intelligence of America’s teenagers, but I can’t help but wish a massive box-office defeat on the latest entry in a string of inexplicably successful films that seem to think that merely recreating one scene after another from recent popular films on a lower budget amounts to hilarity.

In this case, there’s an odd wrinkle, because the Weinstein Company is the target of a boycott by outraged Star Wars fans, angry over the treatment of the upcoming film, “Fanboys.” If I may engage in an act of outrageous self-linkage, I can’t help but sympathize with fanboys and fangirls in the fight for justice. Still, I wouldn’t be surprised to see this come down in the second or third slot on Sunday.

* Run Fat Boy Run,” benefits from the hotness of leading lady Thandie Newton and some geek appeal of it’s own with star and co-writer Simon Pegg, hot-off the mega-cult successes of both the zombie comedy “Shaun of the Dead” and last year’s terrific buddy-cop homage “Hot Fuzz.” But this debut feature from “Friends” actor-turned-director David Schwimmer has generated unenthusiastic reviews despite Pegg being a critical favorite. Even worse, perhaps, it is hampered by a severely unfunny trailer. I wouldn’t expect this one to burn up the multiplexes, though it obviously has some date movie (or at least fantasy date movie) appeal for romantic fanboys avoiding “Superhero Movie”

Meanwhile in Indiewood….
The highly lauded political drama, My Brother is an Only Child hits arthouses this week. It’s a tale of politicized brothers in sixties and seventies Italy who become radicals at opposite ends of the political spectrum. I know, you won’t see it…I might see it. On the other hand, the well-intentioned and semi-lauded sentimental illegal immigration drama “Under the Same Moon” with America Ferrera did substantial business last week, and looks to be around for some time, whether Lou Dobbs likes it or not.

Also David Gordon Green’s “Snow Angels” is expanding some this week. I personally failed to fully grok the arty wunderkind’s ultra-lauded debut miniature, “George Washington,” and have lost track of him since, but at least this drama “of love and loss converging” is a chance to see Kate Beckinsale play a human.

*H/t to Greencine for the Bret Michel and Chris Orr pieces on “21”

A Chat with Adrian Paul (“Highlander: The Source”)

Although he’s been bouncing around Hollywood as far back as 1987, when he played Kolya ‘Nikolai’ Rostov on the “Dynasty” spin-off, “The Colbys,” it’s fair to say that Adrian Paul is more often remembered for his role as Duncan McLeod in the “Highlander” saga. After quite a few episodes of the TV series and a feature film, Paul took a break from the “Highlander” universe for several years, but he returned at long last for last year’s “Highlander: The Source,” which turned up on the Sci-Fi Channel and has recently seen DVD release. We spoken to Paul about his experiences in making the film (and whether there’ll be any more), his thoughts on longtime “Highlander” producer Bill Panzer, why his other sci-fi series, “Tracker,” never really took off, and what he’s been working on recently.

Adrian Paul: Hi Will.

Bullz-Eye: Hey Adrian, how’s it going?

AP: Good, good.

BE: So how hard was it to step back into the shoes of Duncan MacLeod after a few years?

AP: It was interesting. It was a different time, too, you know, and they wanted a slightly different type of character; you know, a little darker. But, you know, it’s fine, and you can do that because you know the values of the character; you kind of step back into it and try and find new stuff. So what with the old and the new stuff, you hopefully have a character with some new twists.

BE: Was it painful to lose your katana after all these years?

AP: (Laughs) No. The thing was, I think nothing’s lost, y’know? I mean, we know where it’s buried! But I love the katana. I love tai chi and working with the katana; I find it a very malleable type of weapon. But I do like using other weapons, too, and we wanted to sort of give it a whole different type of flavor. So we tried it, and even though a lot of the fights were sped up…which wasn’t my idea…we had some really interesting fights. The thing was that we actually tried a whole bunch of different types of weapons and stuff so that we’d have a roundabout look on it, but we didn’t know what we were facing when it comes to visual effects. That was an unknown quantity to us, so all we could do was choreograph it and hope for the best.

Continue reading »

Will Ferrell’s Highs & Lows

Will Ferrell’s never been one to show much concern for his questionable script selection. He pretty much does whatever he wants – from streaking in his tighty whites to wrestling bears (twice) – and gets away with it. Since breaking in to the business in 1998 with the “SNL” sketch-turned-feature film “Night at the Roxbury,” Ferrell has been all about quantity over quality. Over the course of the last decade, the actor has appeared in no less than 25 different projects, and for every career highlight like “Anchorman,” there’s been a box office flop like “Bewitched” to balance it out. Surprisingly, Ferrell’s been able to escape such disasters virtually unscathed, but just because Hollywood is willing to forgive him doesn’t mean we are as well.

In honor of his latest film, Bullz-Eye.com revisited the actor’s best and worst cinematic performances of his career. Check out the list here, and then be sure to come back and discuss.

Will Ferrell

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑