Category: Fall TV Preview (Page 24 of 27)

TCA Press Tour: I am so not in The CW’s demographic…

…and, yet, somehow, they still managed to slip one of the best shows of the upcoming season into their lineup: “Reaper.” But more on that in a bit…along with details about a surprisingly promising comedy called “Aliens in America.” (I haven’t seen the whole episode yet, but the preview was hilarious.)

First up were the pair of announcements from The CW’s executive VP of communications, Paul McGuire, who looks a little bit like Darrell Hammond and, to the relief of the gathered critics, had pretty decent comedic delivery as well. (There’s really nothing more excruciating than watching a network exec get an attack of the flop sweats as they attempt to be funny when it goes against every fiber of their being. Well, maybe watching the pilot for “Cavemen.” But not much else.)

* Supergirl will be flying onto “Smallville” this season, played by Laura Vandervoort. She’s hot, she can fly…what more do you want?

* There’ll be two new cast members on “Supernatural” this season: Lauren Cohan and Katie Cassidy. Katie’s dad, it turns out, is David Cassidy. I was so, so tempted to find her at the party later that night and ask her what her dad’s deal was about only wanting to talk to press who give rave reviews to his albums – back story: I only kinda-sorta liked his recent Target-exclusive album of remixes, and my indifference led to the cancellation of an already-scheduled interview – but I restrained myself…mostly because my wife was with me.

After McGuire’s comedic monologue, he introduced Dawn Ostroff, President of Entertainment with The CW, who dropped the following tidbits:

* On September 18th, the new season of “Beauty and the Geek” premieres with a new twist: this time, there’ll be a male beauty and a female geek.

* The CW has extended their deal with Tyra Banks through the 2009-2010 season, which means that as long as it keeps performing, you’ll keep seeing her within the context of “America’s Top Model.”

* Waiting in the wings: an ensemble comedy called “Eight Days a Week,” starring Christina Milian, Mario Lopez and Justin Hartley and produced by “Will & Grace”‘s Sean Hayes.

* “One Tree Hill” will be back with 22 new episodes…much to the annoyance of several of the critics, you could tell, since they – like me – would rather have seen the return of “Veronica Mars,” instead.

* This season’s new cringe-worthy reality show concept: “Farmer Wants a Wife.” Big city girls move to the country, and “Green Acres”-styled comedy hijinks almost certainly ensue.

* This season’s new cringe-worthy reality show in practice (or, at least, based on the clips I saw): “Crowned: The Mother of All Pageants.” Mother-daughter beauty pageants. It’ll probably be huge. But it made me want to run far, far away.

* Casting changes to new shows: Missy Peregrym, formerly the shape-shifting bad girl from “Heroes,” is now going to be on “Reaper,” while Scott Patterson – a.k.a. Luke from “Gilmore Girls” – will now be the dad on the sitcom “Aliens in America.”

* Chris Rock will finally appear in front of the camera on “Everybody Hates Chris” rather than simply serving as the show’s offscreen narrator. He’ll play a guidance counselor in the season premiere. (Further appearances aren’t currently scheduled, unfortunately.)

* No further movement on that long-rumored “Spike” movie. Says Ostroff, “We typically do not do movies of the week or miniseries. I never say never. You never know. Something could come up that just, you know, feels so right for us. But we have not had any conversations with Joss about the ‘Spike’ movie, although we would love to be in business with Joss in any way.”

* Asia, the winner of last year’s Pussycat Dolls series, has decided to go solo, thereby completely defeating the entire purpose of going through the season to become a member of the group.

* On the subject of “Gilmore Girls” wrapping up last season rather than lingering on for one for year: “We were looking at (the show) as the season was going on,” said Ostroff, “and I think that we all felt that the show had lost about 25 percent of its audience. Lauren Graham, who is, you know, the consummate professional and was truly fantastic to
deal with, as was Alexis — you know, we all talked about it. And I think that, at the end of the day, we just didn’t want to see ‘Gilmore Girls’ go on for another season and see the ratings go down even further. And I think we just felt that a lot of the stories had been told, and it was just time to move on. I was happy that the show ended on the two women, on the girls, because I felt that’s where the show started, and I was happy that that was the focus of how the show ended.”

* On the quick dumping of the much-tauted “Hidden Palms”: “We had ordered it as eight episodes,” explains Ostroff, “and we really saw it as probably a miniseries, a serialized miniseries of eight episodes. And if it were to catch on, we would have had the ability to do more episodes, but that’s really one of the ways that we talked about marketing it and having it on the air.”

* On dumping “Veronica Mars” after only three seasons, despite the loud clamoring of the show’s fans: “I can honestly sit here and I say I can not look back and have any regrets. I feel that we gave ‘Veronica Mars’ every chance,” declares Ostroff. “And as many of you here know, there was no stronger champion of that show than me. You know, we gave it a better time slot to follow up every single year that it was on the air. And eventually, we just had to say how much longer do we go on without the show really catching on? So the taking the show off the air for a while was not the demise of the show. We really tried every single year to figure out how we can bring more viewers in. We just weren’t able to crack it.”

To just close on a personal note, sorry, but I absolutely don’t buy that. “Veronica Mars” was a smart, funny, exciting series, and I refuse to believe that the network couldn’t have tried another timeslot or two to see if any of them worked any better. I mean, the diehards would’ve followed it anywhere they put it, so what would it have hurt?

TCA Press Tour: Have we learned nothing from “Cop Rock”?

Well, if we have, it’s only that if we’re gonna try to create a television show that blends a family drama about a casino in Laughin, Nevada, with singing, you’d better at least have a major star or two in the cast in order to up the “must see” factor…which might well explain why “Viva Laughlin,” CBS’s new “dramatic television show with music” (choice of phrase courtesy of producer Bob Lowry), features recurring appearances by Hugh Jackman and Melanie Griffith…and while I haven’t seen the pilot yet, in the clips we saw before the panel, we bore witness to the former making his entrance by way of The Rolling Stones’ “Sympathy to the Devil,” while the latter cooed Blondie’s “One Way or Another” through a seduction scene.

I’m not saying there isn’t a certain amount of curiosity there. I’m just saying, when the curiosity factor has passed, will the series be able to maintain that level of interest when that responsibility lands on the shoulders of the show’s regular cast?

Maybe that’s why Lowry is, at least to a certain extent, trying to downplay the level of music in the series, throwing out the stat of “two and a half to three” when asked how many songs he was anticipating to appear per episode. “The way I get the fraction out of it,” he explains, “is sometimes we use a reprise.

“What I love about this show — one of the many things that I love about this show — is we always have about four balls in the air,” explains Lowry. “We always have the grounded stories in the casino franchise. We have a murder mystery which we need to have in the air. We have a family drama, we’re juggling that. And how these three areas interweave with our characters and how they play off of each other within these three different dramatic elements. And then, fourth is music. So music doesn’t really outweigh the other three. It’s a question of balance. And I think if we were excessive with music or if music weighed more heavily in these four elements that I’m talking about, then it would be perceived more as a musical. When we’re approaching these stories, we’re telling story first. And I tell them what we are doing is addressing all of these stories as if music did not exist. Because if you were to remove the music, we still want to have a very entertaining, dramatic piece, so we need to have solid story to tell. And then, the music we use to enhance that is sort of an emotional soundtrack of our characters and to support the essence of the scenes.”

As far as song selections, don’t be expecting any Beatles; they simply aren’t down with licensing out their songs for…well, much of anything, really. (Just ask the producers of “The Singing Bee.”) And don’t go looking for Pink Floyd’s “Money,” either. “We wanted to use (‘Money’) because we’re about a casino, and we were simply denied the song. But,” shrugs Lowry, “there are a lot of songs about money.”

As far as how often we’ll see Mr. Jackman pop up during the proceedings, Lowry says he appears a few times during the first few episodes, but “he’s doing a movie in Australia now with Baz Luhrmann, and he has a terrific feature career, and his availability is purely limited to us. I hope we will be able use him more and more up until our 22 episodes, even though we don’t have a pickup for 22. I hope that we will go to 22 and (that) we will use him more.” (Adds star Lloyd Owen, “I think if he sees me getting too many good songs, he’ll start making more appearances.”)

Fortunately, the Tony Award-winning Jackman won’t have the pressure to do all the show’s singing…which, given his apparently rare appearances, stands to reason, really. Even so, star D.B. Woodside acknowledges, “I believe we can all carry a tune…which is good!”

As someone who monitors the release of TV series on DVD, however, I couldn’t help but raise my eyebrows when Lowry admitted that he had no idea if, in fact, the songs in the show were licensed for DVD release purposes. I mean, I wouldn’t bet on this thing being the big fall hit, but crazier things have happened…and if it IS a success, can you imagine what a let-down it would be for fans to discover that, hey, sorry, we can’t actually do it. You’d like to think that people have learned their lesson after the issues with shows like “The Wonder Years” and “WKRP in Cincinnati,” but I guess we’ll see…

TCA Press Tour: How nerdy can a comedy be and still score mainstream success?

That’s the question one really has to ask of “The Big Bang Theory,” the latest production from Chuck Lorre, the man responsible for CBS’s most popular sitcom at the moment, “Two and a Half Men.” The premise involves two complete nerds named Sheldon (Jim Parsons) and Leonard (Johnny Galecki) who have a new sexy neighbor named Penny (Kaley Cuoco) move in across the hall; Leonard is instantly smitten and tries to work out if it’s even remotely possible that he can get together with Penny, while Penny, perhaps inevitably in a sitcom like this, is completely oblivious to both her incredible beauty and the way it affects these two geeks.

Don’t get me wrong: I liked it a lot, and I laughed repeatedly. But I also found my head spinning at the sheer complexity of the punchlines on occasion…and, to be fair, I also felt a little outed as a geek when I saw Sheldon wearing a t-shirt bearing the image of DC Comics hero The Flash and realized that I had the same shirt.

Parsons acknowledged the major mouthfuls he gets saddled with in the pilot. “It was a lot of memorization (and) a lot of writing down lines,” he admitted. “But it was a pleasure. It was…”

“…a lot of takes,” interjected Galecki.

“…a lot of takes,” repeated Parsons. “No, it wasn’t. I did very well. It’s a wonderful thing, actually, that many words, because it’s something good to rely on when you get out there. You got that behind you. You don’t have to think as much. You have to concentrate on getting that damn line out, and then everything else is taking care of itself.”

At the end of the pilot, we’re left wondering if Leonard really has a shot with Penny…and, surprisingly, it doesn’t seem as far-fetched as you’d think. Penny’s a sweetheart, and Leonard clearly really likes her, so you do find yourself rooting for the two to get together. Don’t hold your breath on it happening any time soon, though; Lorre hopes you’ll keep wondering about it for quite some time. “It’s a question that we ask ourselves all the time as we’re writing the series,” he says. “How to develop this long, and if there’s sexual tension, you know, how to take it in ways that it hasn’t been taken before. Are there new paths to take with this kind of a relationship? Can it be consummated? I mean, those are the questions we sit around and ask ourselves all day long when we’re writing the show.”

Adds co-producer Bill Prady, “It’s important to try to listen to the characters, to be true to what Leonard would do next and then to ask the question of, given that he’s done that, does that move him closer to his goal.”

Honestly, I hope they don’t move too fast on moving the pair together. The heart of the series seems to be the relationship between Sheldon and Leonard – and, yes, TV geeks, those names are a very intentional tribute to the famous comedy writer, Sheldon Leonard – as well as the one between the duo and their other two geek buddies, Howard (Simon Helberg, late of “Studio 60”) and Rajesh (Kunal Nayyar). Obviously, watching all four of them react to Penny is hilarious, but, in general, the mere concept of watching these guys attempt to function in normal society is where the comedy really lies for me.

I can’t imagine why I relate to it so much.

TCA Press Tour: Newsflash – “Moonlight” in no way resembles “Angel”!

Any similarities you may find between the two series, both of which are produced by David Greenwalt and are about a vampire who – ho, ho – moonlights as a detective, are, of course, complete coincidence. Right…?

Says Greenwalt, “My agent said in May, “You’ve got to read this ‘Moonlight.’ It’s fantastic. And I read a couple of pages and discovered it was (about a) vampire detective, and I said, ‘Not only am I not going to read this, I’m going to sue them. This is my show!’ But he kept talking to me and, eventually, I did read it, and I did fall in love with it.

“It’s vampire 2007. It’s a new ball game. You know, it’s certainly a genre show. But just some tiny examples. You know, there are no other demons, there’s no other monsters. You know, it’s not that supernatural of a world. It’s a sleek modern world, Los Angeles. And literally the vampire makeup is different, the mythology is different, and it’s a world where they really live among us. And there’s not that many of them. And the show has all my favorite things. It’s got deep heart, and big love, and funny, which I am attracted to.”

Actor Alex O’Laughlin, meanwhile, is just plain attracted to playing a vampire, so he’s quite psyched about scoring the lead role of vampire detective Mick St. John. “I’ve been kind of obsessed with the genre since I first discovered it,” he admits. “I discovered Anne Rice when I was sort of late teens. And I read the first five or six books of “The Vampire Chronicles” twice, actually, which was a little obsessive. But I loved her character development, (and) I learned so much about the mythology of vampires through her storytelling. Also, I grew up in Australia with American TV and American cinema, because we didn’t really have that much of our own, so I grew up with all of the films that you guys did; ‘The Lost Boys’ was a huge film for me when that was made, and the ‘The Hunger’ was also something that I really loved. So, yeah, I’ve always sort of wanted to play a vampire!”

Basically, what fans of Greenwalt’s previous show should be aware of is that this is a very different universe from the one in which Angel and company reside. There are comparatively few vampires in the world of “Moonlight” (“Maybe there’s a thousand or two in all of Los Angeles,” says Greenwalt, “(so) it’s a small thing”), and, as it stands right now, there aren’t trolls, demons, and whatnot wandering around.

A closing note: during the “Bones” panel, someone asked David Boreanaz if he was planning to do a cameo on Greenwalt’s new vampire-turned-detective show. “Yeah,” he said, with a laugh. “Maybe I’ll show up as the guy who kills the vampire.”

TCA Press Tour: Newsflash – “Kid Nation” in no way resembles “Lord of the Flies”!

Any similarities you may find between the novel by William Golding and this TV show which children are placed in a New Mexico ghost town and given the task of creating a functioning society without the assistance of any adults…? Completely coincidence!

Okay, maybe not complete coincidence.

“I don’t think any of us were unaware of ‘Lord of the Flies,'” acknowledges producer Tom Forman, who also admits that it took “six seconds” for the similarity to the book to come up. “The minute we started talking about it, we stopped and said, ‘Are we making a reality ‘Lord of the Flies’?’ and said, ‘Well, there will be elements.’ I mean, I’m not going to deny the comparison: these are kids living on their own. That said, like every reality show, there are adults off-camera waiting to step in if kids got violent. They didn’t. We didn’t have to, and that’s okay. But they had heated arguments and discussions.”

The show has already come under considerable controversy from those who rush to presume that the kids were worked like dogs for the purposes of making the show work, but Forman denies that categorically. “The kids woke up whenever they wanted and went to bed whenever they wanted,” he assures us, “and that was part of our commitment when we came up with this idea and decided to do it. We were going to follow their lead. A large adult safety net was there to make sure that if anything happened we had a contingency plan in place. But they woke up whenever they felt like it.
They set their own bedtime. And they discussed those things and debated them. So there were mornings they got up early. There were mornings they slept in. We taped whatever happened.”

Still, there was one question that was gnawing at me and, clearly, other writers as well: why weren’t any of the kids from this show up on the panel…?

“They are not here today because they would show me up on this panel,” replied Forman, sounding like he was only about half joking. “I think the moment that we introduce those kids, they should be in the limelight, not me. That’s the only reason they’re not here today. I think, almost to a one, the kids would tell you this was the best experience of their lives. I think, almost to a one, the parents agree. It’s really important to us that they went into this with an understanding of what it was going to be, both the child and the parent. And as I said, we spent a tremendous amount of time together, more than any executive producer and potential cast member in the history of reality TV, talking about what to expect from all of this. You know, there were absolutely kids there who shed tears. There were tough days for everyone: the kids, the cast, the crew. It was hard. But again, they leaned on each other, and I think they emerged stronger and smarter and wiser than when they went in and, as they all kept saying, with friends that they will know for the rest of their lives. We talk to them a lot. I exchange e-mails with every one of these kids, and they’re doing just great.”

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑