Category: Documentaries (Page 34 of 43)

TCA Press Tour, Day 6: PBS, Pt. 2

“Frontline”: “The Choice” and “Heat”: Well, this’ll be short, as I was up in my room, writing blog posts when this panel was taking place. As to “The Choice,” you may have seen previous editions of this special in 2004 and 2000, as it’s become a regular tradition on PBS to provide a dual biography of the Democratic and Republican Presidential candidates, so if you’re a political junkie, you’re probably gonna want to check out the latest entry in the series of specials. “Heat,” as it happens, is produced by Martin Smith, who served as producer on an earlier edition of “The Choice,” but his latest work is all about global warning. with twelve countries from around the world participating in the special. That’s all I’ve got. Check it out if it sounds interesting to you.

“Nature: American Eagle”: Eagles are beautiful, beautiful creatures, and “Nature” is a gorgeously filmed program. Two great tastes that taste great together. ‘Nuff said. (Can you tell I was still up in my room for this panel, too?)

“Make ‘Em Laugh: The Funny Business Of America”: Even though the film buff in me is admittedly psyched about that Warner Brothers story doc, I’m way more excited about this series, which, per filmmaker Michael Kantor, “starts with Charlie Chaplin and ends somewhere in the Jon Stewart world.” I’ve been a huge fan of comedy for as long as I can remember – we’re talking TV, film, albums, and, God help me, I was even a dedicated “Dr. Demento” listener until his program stopped being aired in my area – and I positively foaming at the mouth with the clips they showed us. The breaking news came at the beginning – Billy Crystal has been signed to provide narration for this six-part series – and, from there, we were treated to some extremely funny comments from the panel, which included Richard Lewis, Anne Beatts (an original “SNL” writer as well as the creative mind behind “Square Pegs”), and Larry Wilmore (otherwise known as the Senior Black Correspondent for “The Daily Show”).

Richard Lewis on the appropriate use of profanity in comedy: “Listen, you know, when I would listen to a double album of Lenny Bruce at Berkeley, I mean, I had no idea I was going to become a comedian. I was about 18. But a bar was set, and it wasn’t the expletives that I was focused on. It was, like, these insanely brilliant routines in that double album, and it had a lot of his great bits. And once I, two years later, became a comedian and Pryor was already a star, basically, and he’s a genius. He’s arguably the greatest, to me, stand-up comedian. Lenny may be the most important, and Jonathan Winters in a lot of ways perhaps more spectacularly open-ended, hilarious human being I’ve ever known, but he was worked very, very clean…in fact, totally clean, Jonathan. The other two guys didn’t, but it was more street talk and character stuff for Richard. And for Lenny, the same. But, you know, there are a vast majority of comedians who use expletives almost as a punch line to get laughs at clubs or at a concert, and as a comedian myself…and I’m a little blue from time to time, it sneaks out, but it’s never a premise, or it’s never a punch line. Tragically, it cheapens the art form.”

Larry Wilmore on Bill Hicks: “He probably didn’t get a chance to really get into the mainstream, but all of the comics at the time during the ’80s respected Bill Hicks. I remember working with him in Houston, I think, in the mid-’80s, and I couldn’t believe how just raw and funny he was.”

Anne Beatts on Tina Fey: “She’s great, hilarious, wonderful, talented, pretty, good legs, everything. She’s terrific. But I did misguidedly tell her not to wear her glasses on television. I was so wrong.”

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour, Day 6: PBS, Pt. 1

“NOVA: The Bible’s Buried Secrets”: It might’ve been appropriate to open the Sunday sessions with a Bible story, but it was pretty heady stuff for us to absorb so early in the morning. Paula Apsell, producer of “NOVA,” introduced “The Bible’s Buried Secrets” thusly: “Shot in Israel, Egypt, Syria, and the U.S., the film challenges viewers to think about the Bible in an entirely new way, one that exams the message and the meaning even as it looks for a historical core. What emerges is provocative new evidence surrounding the origins of monotheism and the ethical code that accompanies it, ideas that change the world and resonate for us today as it did then.” Fascinating stuff, sure, but way too much to take in at 9:00 AM. But there was at least one portion of the discussion that captured my attention: the question about whether God had a wife.

Professor William G. Dever responds: “The reason why God is so bad-tempered in the Old Testament is mostly he was lonely. And if he had listened to his wife, he wouldn’t have done those bad things. We know that in the minds of many ordinary Israelites, there was a pair of deities. Why shouldn’t there be? There was everywhere else in the ancient world. You have to remember monotheism is a difficult consideration. The development of monotheism is late, in some cases arbitrary and even artificial. A much more natural system is to have a plethora of gods, one for each need. And that’s what most peoples in the ancient world thought, and so did they in Israel. The very fact that the prophets and reformers condemned the worship of other gods means it was going on all over the place. Otherwise, why talk about it? So it’s clear that while those who wrote the Bible and edited it and passed it down were rigid monotheists, so to speak, all men, in the minds of many, God, of course, had a consort. And why not? If women had written the Bible, the portrait of God would be different.”

How would it have been different? Too…many…jokes. Must…move…on…to…next…panel…

“NOVA: Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives”: This one was actually even more headspinning than its predecessor, since it was about the late physicist Hugh Everett and his Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which predicts that every time we make a decision, a parallel universe splits off from our everyday reality (ow, my head just exploded!), but what made it stand out was the fact that it views Everett’s work through the eyes of his decidedly non-mathematical son, Mark…who you may know better as E, the heavily-bearded frontman for The Eels.

The key to the show is the relationship between E and his father…or, more specifically, the lack thereof. Hugh Everett died in 1982, so he never saw his son become a famous musician (at least from a cult standpoint), but…you’ll pardon the unintentional pun…they really were living in two different worlds. “I think it is a common thread with a lot of families that fathers and sons have their issues and maybe don’t always connect,” said E, “but we didn’t connect at all. I mean, it was sort of shocking the degree of how isolated he seemed to me, growing up in the same house with him all those years. But how do you relate to the rest of the world when that’s what’s going on in your mind, you know?”

E did have some fond memories of his father, despite their lack of a connection. “I remember him delighting in things like ‘Star Trek’ and ‘The Twilight Zone’ and science fiction books. We’d have neighbors come running over and…they’d be sitting in a hammock one summer day, reading a science fiction book, and it would have a reference to my father, and they’d come running over and knock on the door, all excited.”

There’s a scene in the film when the producers find some tapes of E with his dad, and for all his enthusiasm about working on this project (he calls it “an extraordinary process” and “probably the single-most life-changing thing I’ve been through”), there was clearly still a certain amount of annoyance about the way he found his way to hearing these tapes. “I didn’t want to listen to the tapes,” he admitted. “It was a really awkward moment for me when I walked into the room. The filmmakers had already listened to some of the tapes, and they were all kind of looking at me like…it was like they set a trap for me. I was scared. It was just the weirdest thing was hearing his voice for the first time in, whatever, 25 years or something. I couldn’t even remember his voice, but then as soon as I heard it, I remembered it really well.”

E’s comments make it pretty clear that the gene for physics skipped a gene, but he’s resigned to it. “I’m not bitter about not being a mathematics genius at all,” he assured us. “I’d much rather be a rock star. The groupies are a lot better.

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour, Day 2: WEtv

I must admit, I have a soft spot in my heart for WEtv. It’s not because I find myself watching it all that much of my own accord, you understand, but my wife is a diligent viewer of “Bridezillas” marathons, and I’ve been known to get caught up in an episode or two while she’s watching that show. And, okay, I had quite a few laughs at “Party Mamas,” too. Oh, hell, if I’m going to talk up the network at all, then I should also praise “High School Confidential,” which was a really fantastic reality series that explored the lives of twelve girls over the course of four years.

Fine. I like WEtv. Happy?

And I’m probably going to end up liking it a bit more now that they’re adding a very interesting new series called “The Locator.”

Troy Dunn is the titular character of this reality series, and he’s a gentleman who has spent the past 18 years finding over 40,000 people and reconnecting lives. Steve Cheskin, head of programming for WeTV, couldn’t say enough good things about it, but probably the greatest compliment he paid was this: “It was the best-testing, highest-testing pilot I ever remember in my 20-some years of being in the business.” Indeed, it’s such a heartwarming premise for a series, with Dunn going on a quest in each episode to find a friend or family member who’s been MIA for years…and, in the case of the latter, they’ve sometimes never even met, such as in the pilot episode, where we see a young woman named Katie go on a quest to find her mother.

Continue reading »

TCA Press Tour, Day 1: TV One

There’s a good side and a bad side to being the network that starts off the TCA Press Tour. The good is that you’re catching the TV critics in your audience at their absolute freshest, but the bad is that that audience is almost certainly going to be the smallest of the tour, since not all of the critics have even arrived yet and many of the ones who have arrived simply don’t care enough to attend. But even though I’m not personally part of TV One’s primary demographic – Johnathan Rodgers, President and CEO of TV One, dropped the stat in his opening remarks that 93 percent of the network’s viewership is African-Americans – I didn’t fly from Virginia to L.A. for nothing, you know. And, besides, just because I’m not the droid they’re looking for doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate a certain amount of the programming they have to offer.

Take “Murder in Black and White,” for instance.

Hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton (who was originally scheduled to be in attendance but bowed out in order to be near his longtime friend Rev. Timothy Wright, who is recovering from injuries sustained as a result of a recent car accident), “Murder in Black and White” is a series of four one-hour documentary specials which were spearheaded by filmmaker Keith Beauchamp (“The Untold Story of Emmett Louis Till”) and filmed in cooperation with the FBI in an attempt to help solve civil rights murders from the 1940s and the 1950s. I haven’t seen a full-length episode yet, but I was thoroughly impressed by the clip that was shown during the panel, which was, appropriately enough, filmed in black and white. The story would be horrifyingly gripping either way, given that it’s about Willie Edwards, a 24-year-old truck driver, husband, and father of two children who was forced by Ku Klux Klan members to jump off a bridge 50 feet high, but the starkness of the black and white film most certainly adds to the effect.

Beauchamp was in attendance for the panel, and he defended the arguably sensational nature of the re-enactments contained within the specials.

“After you see the documentary itself,” he said, “you will find that I have a way of telling stories. I like to tell the stories from the people who were there, who actually lived this atrocity. And the most important thing is for us to make these victims human. So often, we hear about these murders that occurred throughout the Civil Rights era, and you think it’s just a murder and we move on with our lives. But we have to understand that these people were also human beings as well. So using a reenactment, I really wanted to use the tools of this generation to capture the tension of this generation, and the way to do that is by visuals. Filmmaking to me is a new way of activism. No more should we rely on our leadership and our community to talk about these atrocities and bring certain issues forward. Nothing hits you more than a visual.”

Actually, facts do a pretty good job of smacking you in the face, too, as proven by Rodgers’ initial introduction of the panel, when he mentioned that the individuals who had been arrested for Edwards’ murder had their charges dismissed because “merely forcing a person to jump from a bridge does not naturally and probably lead to the death of such person.”

Though “Murder in Black and White” may be rough to watch, I’m confident that Beauchamp’s dedication to this project will make it a must see.

There’s another upcoming series on TV One that has caught my attention as well: “Unsung,” described by Rodgers as chronicling African-American music artists who deserved to earn superstar status but never made it. I don’t know that I necessarily agree with all of their choices (the first four programs will focus on Donny Hathaway, Phyllis Hyman, the DeBarge family, and the Clark Sisters), but the premise is sufficiently interesting for me to be curious about how the program will turn out.

Welcome back, my friends, to the show that never ends: The TCA Press Tour

Here I am in L.A., sitting in my first panel of the Television Critics Association press tour for Summer 2008, and, man oh man, it’s been a long wait for me to get back to one of these things.

I’d had every intention of attending the Winter 2007 tour, but as you may recall, the Writer’s Strike put the kabosh on that event…and with the battle between the SGA (Screen Actors Guild) and their brethren in AFTRA (American Federation of Television and Radio Artists), it looked for a while like this tour might not happen, either. Heck, it’s still not impossible that this thing could stop dead in its tracks if it turns out that the members of AFTRA haven’t accepted the contract offered to them by the AMPTP (Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers), as you can read about here. But I think the general presumption is that AFTRA will accept the contract, and if they do, then it’s far less likely that the SGA will decide to strike.

There are a lot of really great panels this time around, and I look forward to bringing you info about just about every single one of them, so stay tuned!

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Premium Hollywood

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑