Recently, Entertainment Weekly ran an article comparing the big screen introduction of “Serenity” star Nathan Fillion to that of Harrison Ford during his “Star Wars” days. What’s upsetting about the piece is that the magazine is merely theorizing that the characters of Han Solo and Malcolm Reynolds are similar, and not the two actors. While Nathan Fillion is certainly a good enough actor to reach star status (he’s even got a new horror film with Universal coming out in March 2006), he probably won’t make it for a few more years, and most certainly not playing his old “Firefly” character since the poor box office numbers have likely killed any chance of a sequel to “Serenity” or a TV rebirth. Still, since when has gauging an actor’s future by one role ever worked? Solo and Reynolds are nothing alike, and neither is Fillion and Ford, so just drop it EW, okay?