Roman Polanski can remain silent no longer!

Pola600

This week’s box office breakdown is coming up in just a bit, but first we have a bit of late breaking news…

Just when you thought it was safe to go into an Internet comment thread, Roman Polanski has issued a rather dramatic statement using the refrain, “I can remain silent no longer!” In it, he basically recapitulates the argument made in “Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired” and, ironically, argues that the documentary is the reason his case has taken on a second wind very late in the game. Also, he tacitly admits that he committed a crime on that ill-starred night in 1977, and refers to its victim as “the victim.” Not, of course, that that changes anything, nor am I sure this is anything really new, but it’s interesting. You can read the complete text of his statement here on a New York Times pdf, via Anne Thompson.

I’ve been guilty of quibbling over what I see as the often overheated rhetoric and assumptions made about certain aspects of this case, here and elsewhere. I’d also probably write my review of the highly watchable but perhaps not so unassailable Marina Zenovich documentary which Polanski believes restarted the whole affair, a bit differently now than I did back when I wrote it. Still, I think three things are safe to say: 1. Polanski committed a very serious crime on the night in question — no matter how I might quibble over the wording and what precisely has been legally proven and not, there is no way that giving drugs to and then having sex with a thirteen year-old is not, at the very least, an act of child molestation; 2. Polanski is a great film-maker; 3. 1 and 2 have nothing to do with each other.

Having said that, I think Anne Thompson is right. Polanski did a terrible thing and has admitted as much, but is hardly a danger to anyone at this point and, given that he has now been incarcerated twice, there really should be, as she says, “a way to fix this.” You can and should make a case that wealthy people like Polanski should not be given special treatment, but I’m not convinced that a poor man on a first-offense charge would necessarily have received harsher treatment on the same charge, under similar circumstances, at the same point in time.

Ewan McGregor in Of course, me and Thompson are both moved by a rather selfish desire of our own. “The Ghost Writer” was a first-rate throwback to a caliber of straightforward craftsmanship we rarely see these days. I know that should have no bearing on how this is all worked out in the end but, still, I’d like more, if that’s possible.

  

You can follow us on Twitter @moviebuffs and on Facebook as well.

Related Posts

Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland

Roman Polanski in 1978

I’ll be getting to the weekend box office fairly soon but we have some breaking news today. Kind of a bombshell, actually.

As if to fill the void left by the conclusion of the Phil Specter case, a long-running Hollywood legal drama of some real significance has reemerged this morning and is almost certain to be filling the gossip and news pages for some time. As I write this, arguably one of one of the world’s five or so greatest living directors, whose resume includes “Chinatown,” “Rosemary’s Baby,” 2002’s “The Pianist” and the psychological horror classics “Repulsion” and “The Tenant,” is under arrest at age 76 and may be extradited back to L.A. county. This one could get messy and makes yet another painful and extraordinary chapter in the life of a director and occasional actor who escaped the Holocaust as a child, became an internationally famous filmmaker during the sixties, lost his pregnant actress wife in one of the most brutal murder rampages in U.S. history, and then nearly lost everything else over a inexcusable drunken encounter nearly a decade later.

Younger readers may not be aware how, in 1978, 45 year-old director Roman Polanski was arrested after having sex and sharing champagne and part of a Quaalude — a tranquilizer and de riguer party drug of the time — with 13 year-old Samantha Geimer. The victim’s name has only become public knowledge in recent years when, now middle-aged, she has come out publicly to forgive Polanski and call for a conclusion to the extremely muddy and muddled case which, however you come down on it, has more sides to it than you are likely aware of.

Indeed, though you may be hearing now end of moral grandstanding this week, this is no simple case. Even as someone who literally grew up with the matter and with Polanski’s career, I really knew very little about it before seeing and reviewing Marina Zenovich’s outstanding film about the matter: “Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired.” As Zenovich said in the film’s commentary, Polanski was both a perpetrator and a victim of a publicity hungry judge who used to case for his own ends and drew out the case needlessly. The real heroes of her film were, ironically, both the prosecutor and the defense attorneys in the case. Yes, Virginia, there may be two honest lawyers in greater Los Angeles.

Anyhow, there are any number of questions at this point, including how did Polanski’s lawyers not know what the Swiss authorities might do? (Polanski has been able to live peacefully in France because the U.S.-France extradition treaty does not cover his particular crime and he is highly regarded there. He has carefully avoided being seen in countries such as England where the laws are different.) Nikki Finke calls it a double-cross.

This case is huge and has already been condemned by French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand who is in communication with President Nicolas Sarkozy. No doubt, even as we speak poor Robert Gibbs is probably trying to figure what President Obama’s answer should be when he’s asked about it. Maybe he can use the whole “ongoing legal matter” construction to avoid it. That’s what I’d try to do.

Whatever happens, we certainly won’t be avoiding the case here. Stay tuned.

  

Related Posts